mg-mmm
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: enough is not enough, or is it?

To: mg-mmm@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: enough is not enough, or is it?
From: Kellmg@aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:57:04 EST
Reply-to: Kellmg@aol.com
Sender: owner-mg-mmm@autox.team.net
In a message dated 01/07/2002 9:21:34 PM Central Standard Time,
mgwizard@caloundra.net writes:



> Somebody else raised the comment that PA's started out as P's & became PA
> when the PB was thought up.
>
> Well how early did PA get first stamped on Guarantee plate ?  I have seen
> one PA 1668.  Any earlier ones noted?
>



Nice one Pip,

I've often read and heard that  the PA was only a P-Type until the PBS came
along.
One of the original sales catalogues that the factory issued only calls it
"P-Type"
No mention of PA.
However, on my copy of the original "Sales Department-Service Department"
sales sheet 29/3/34 it reads PA 0512. Then through the year of '34 there are
correspondences as early as 8th May, also, referring to it as PA.
Am I right in saying that PA chassis are stamped PA and that  PB chassis are
stamped PB

Pip asks,
Did they really pull apart some PAs & make them into PB's

Indeed. At least 25 of them. It's written in the Bible that they could not
sell them once they had introduced the PB.

You read it on the Net. it must be true!!

Brian Kelly.

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-mmm
///  Send list postings to mg-mmm@autox.team.net


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>