I wouldn't buy the argument that a shift light
is a 'light' in the wording of 13.2.A., (clearly a
tortured interpretation) but I might buy it
as an 'indicator'.
Now we are back to Mark's question about "hav(ing)
no effect on performace".
Not so sure about that part. . . . .
Roger 2
----- Original Message -----
From: Smokerbros@aol.com
To: rjohnson@friendlynet.com ; autox@autox.team.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: rev limiter?
In a message dated 12/6/00 1:18:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rjohnson@friendlynet.com writes:
No - adding a tach is specifically allowed, as long as
one accepts that it is a 'guage'. (13.2.A, page 86)
And while 13.2.A makes no allowance for a rev limiter
(mho), there is clearly an allowance for "indicators" and
"lights".
Might one successfully make the argument that a shift light
is an "indicator"?
I'm in agreement that a tach is a gauge, and that a light or indicator is
allowed, and that a limiter is not.
CHD
|