In reviewing all of this this seems rediculous.
A rev limiter is more of a saftey device, it does not
make you go faster. Now the idiot light that can be
attached to the rev limiter is a datafeedback performance
enhancement and should not be added.
jack ~
> From autox-owner@autox.team.net Wed Dec 6 16:56:27 2000
> X-Authentication-Warning: teamfat2.dsl.aros.net: majordom set sender to
>owner-autox@Autox.Team.Net using -f
> From: Smokerbros@aol.com
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 19:55:22 EST
> Subject: Re: rev limiter?
> To: rjohnson@friendlynet.com, autox@autox.team.net
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Disposition: Inline
> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
>
> In a message dated 12/6/00 1:18:40 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> rjohnson@friendlynet.com writes:
>
>
> > No - adding a tach is specifically allowed, as long as
> > one accepts that it is a 'guage'. (13.2.A, page 86)
> >
> > And while 13.2.A makes no allowance for a rev limiter
> > (mho), there is clearly an allowance for "indicators" and
> > "lights".
> >
> > Might one successfully make the argument that a shift light
> > is an "indicator"?
> >
> I'm in agreement that a tach is a gauge, and that a light or indicator is
> allowed, and that a limiter is not.
>
> CHD
|