autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Short overlaps (was Rocky's Stats for 2000?)

To: "'Joe Goeke'" <jcgz3@hotmail.com>, jemitchell@compuserve.com,
Subject: RE: Short overlaps (was Rocky's Stats for 2000?)
From: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:29:00 -0700
Joe Goeke writes...

>I don't see any real changes needed to support 1200 >entrants, based on how

>proactive all the organizers were in keeping the 
>event running.

Agreed, but fifteen second overlaps is:

A) Dangerous
B) Can slow down the event even more with reruns
C) Further necessitates the need for audits, because NO ONE can keep up with
that pace, not even the Ironman athletes and computer geeks of SFR. 

Fifteen second overlaps = overkill. Hopefully, that won't happen again. Or
if it does, sign me up to work course because I like extreme sports.

Katie K.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>