To: | "Dave Kizerian" <davek@urjet.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Shotz's WS-6 Prep Level (was RE: Uh oh, M3s in ESP) |
From: | "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com> |
Date: | Tue, 30 May 2000 12:34:36 -0700 |
> So what is being said here is that if someone starts racing a 5 to 10 year > old car that isn't a camaro,firebird or mustang, but is classed in ESP > you'll "DEAL" with it?!?!? The CP major rules proposal explictly stated they wanted CP to be an American muscle car class. I didn't see Team.Net protests about that. What's wrong with making a car class identity/branding strong? CP and ESP are two of the three largest classes at nationals, and it's because of their strong branding/identity (and NOT which PARTICULAR branding/identity). |
Previous by Date: | Was nutty ESP - now Classing cars vs. people, Andrew_Bettencourt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: WS-6 classed wrong too ? Was: Re: Shotz's WS-6 Prep Level, Linnhoff, Eric |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Shotz's WS-6 Prep Level (was RE: Uh oh, M3s in ESP), dg50 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Shotz's WS-6 Prep Level (was RE: Uh oh, M3s in ESP), Brad Cox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |