[Mgs] Fw: MGB Question

dave n dave at ranteer.com
Wed Jan 11 09:56:11 MST 2017

just to add to the general misinformation, I modified a different british car (TR6) with mild cam, lightened flywheel, decked the block, polished and ported the head as well as shaved it, mild cam, electric fan, and a few other goodies.  also went from 2 carbs to 3 (it’s a 6 cylinder).  running close to 11:1 compression.  also modified the suspension, tires (but not the wheels) and the brakes.  remember – more go power needs more stopping power

car has a somewhat lumpy idle, but other than that is a joy to drive on the street or the occasional autocross.  the wife complains about the bumpier ride, but my son and I love it.  would totally do it again.

plan the upgrades from the getgo.  redo the whole car in a consistent manner and you will love it.  do one part, and you will start buying parts to do another part, etc

also remember this adage – if you plan on redoing a house, car, boat, etc., go out and get three estimates.  then add them all up and that is what it will cost you.

From: David Councill via Mgs 
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 10:32 AM
To: mgs at autox.team.net 
Subject: Re: [Mgs] Fw: MGB Question

To add to these replies, which I agree with, it does depend on how you want to use the car. I faced a similar scenario with my 72B’s rebuild about ten years ago. Although it is an 18V engine block, I went with HC +0.060 pistons that I acquired from the UK (ebay dealer mechspec who also has an Internet site). This put the compression ratio around 9:1. I also used a 270 cam. I did not modify the head except to have hardened seats installed. I was looking for increased performance while maintaining the car as a driver. I was hesitant to increase the compression ratio too much as that would make it harder to find fuel for it, particularly in rural areas. This was based on previous experience – with my first MGB, a 1965 B, I installed an engine with a 10:1 compression (as I recall but it could have been higher, this was several decades ago). It was a fast car but back then, when leaded fuel was still available, I sometimes had problems finding a high enough octane fuel and in those cases, the car would keep running after I turned the ignition off. I don’t recall the octane back then but where I live now, the highest octane rating I can find locally (within a 30 mile or so radius) is 93 at two stations, 91-92 is typical for the rest.


David Councill

67 BGT

64 B

72 B


From: Mgs [mailto:mgs-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Richard Lindsay via Mgs
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:03 AM
To: Jack Wheeler
Cc: mgs at autox.team.net List
Subject: Re: [Mgs] Fw: MGB Question


Hi Jack, et al.,


Thought I would chime in, philosophically. 


Just please remember that any engine design is a tradeoff between power, reliability, and cleanliness. Add to that known adage, 'drivability'. Old engines have fixed cam timing. That means the valve timing is set to the give optimum drivability - so maximum top end performance is not achieved. But if you tune for 5000rpm, the car is beast to drive at lower speeds.


Okay, I've said what everyone else has said, perhaps except for this: What is YOUR goal? Decide upon that then build accordingly, and accept the limitations associated with that solution.




Mgs at autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/mgs/dave@ranteer.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/mgs/attachments/20170111/800d0d06/attachment.html>

More information about the Mgs mailing list