triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: restorations

To: "'Peter Zaborski'" <peterz@merak.com>, "'Joe Curry'" <spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: RE: restorations
From: "Gambony, Jim" <jim.gambony@eds.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 15:09:39 -0500
Cc: "'TR6 List'" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Peter, 

On the later Spitfires the non-od 4th was about 17mph/1000 rpm, and the o/d
4th is about 20 mph/1000 rpm.  

I figured Joe probably had the 3.89, but I wasn't going to assume... 


Jim
(whose Mini Cooper turns 4k at 50 mph :(

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Zaborski [SMTP:peterz@merak.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 1998 2:52 PM
> To:   'Joe Curry'
> Cc:   'TR6 List'
> Subject:      RE: restorations
> 
> 
> > From: Joe Curry [mailto:spitlist@gte.net]
> > Sent: Friday, August 14, 1998 1:49 PM
> > 
> > I'm going somewhere around 80mph at that rpm.
> 
> Oh 80 is not so bad. I had visions of either triple digit speeds or a
> tongue-in-cheek posting. Seeing no smiley anywhere, I assumed the former.
> But I guess the Spits are quite highly strung. In any event (and you
> probably know this already), that O/D makes a huuuge difference in the
> highway cruising aspect of our cars.
> 
> Did the Spits have a higher reduction O/D or would the power limitations
> prevent that kind of long leggedness?
> 
> --- Peter Zaborski  CF58310UO  Calgary,Canada ---

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>