To both parties involved:
Looks like this issue will be resolved. As in most of these cases, it
seems to be a combination of honest mistakes and less than ideal
communication.
Hope both of you can write it off as experience, and come out of this with
something positive.
Robert Carley
Ontario, Canada
On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Steve Darby wrote:
> Joe and Trish wrote:
> >
> > Hi listers!
> >
> > You are right...this list is the best I've seen. I want to thank all of
> > you that responded. The vote is overwhelmingly for putting his name and
> > address on the list.
> >
> > Because I've also been in the legal field (court clerk..district judge),
> > we've decided to email him ONE more time and give him an end date, and
> > then we'll let everyone know exactly who this character is. Joe had
> > corresponded with him several times and thought he knew him. Joe is
> > usually a very good judge of character, but he's also the most trusting
> > guy I know. He's given away Spit parts just because someone else needed
> > them more than we did. I hated to see how this guy treated us.
> >
> > We were truly impressed by the support and offers of help from all of
> > you. You are all invited to come and ride in my '70 Spit this spring
> > when we have it on the road. We'll even serve coffee and donuts
> > (bagels?).
> >
> > I'll let all of you know how it turns out. Thanks again.
> >
> > Trish
> >
> > 1970 Triumph Spitfire...almost ready to go!!!
> > Boise, ID
>
>
> Joe & Trish
>
> Before you bash someone one the net and ruin their reputation, we have
> been TRYING very hard to find you. This is the fourth messages that we
> have sent out trying to locate you. You did not reply! My husband DID
> send the check! I am sorry you did not received the check. You did
> call but did not leave a phone number and unfortunately my husband
> discarded your address. We DO NOT cheat people. NO AMOUNT OF MONEY OR
> MATERIAL GOODS ARE WORTH OUR INTEGRITY! We will send you another check,
> but we need your address or phone number. We want to make sure you GET
> your money this time.
>
> Eileen
>
|