triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: spit 1500 rear wheel chamber (fwd)

To: triumph mail exploder <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Re: spit 1500 rear wheel chamber (fwd)
From: Michael Galloway <mgx@icesar.epm.ornl.gov>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 18:05:35 -0500 (EST)
andy ...

nope, i mean positive chamber (or neutral), wheels even at the top
or further apart than at the bottom. i don't know much but about
my spit yet, but i did read the manual on this one :)

makes it wild as hell in the corners at speed too!

-- michael


On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Andrew Mace wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Mar 1997, Michael Galloway wrote:
> 
> 
> Forgive me, but I assume you mean NEGATIVE wheel CAMBER -- wheels closer 
> to each other at the top than at the bottom. No or a bit of negative 
> camber is fine for the Spitfire 1500 (exact specs not readily at hand). 
> Much more than a few degress negative, though, is cause for concern. If 
> the spring has sagged, and they inevitably do, it's possible that it 
> could be rearched, so long as there are no broken leaves (also not 
> uncommon); otherwise, a new spring probably is in order.
> 
> --Andy


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>