triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR6 vacuum retard

To: Aaron Johnson <sugar@holly.colostate.edu>
Subject: Re: TR6 vacuum retard
From: mrdr@buckeyeweb.com (The Romagni's)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 19:04:48 -0500
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
References: <199703101843.LAA292678@holly.ColoState.EDU>
Aaron Johnson wrote:
> 
> Why would you want to retard the engine.  This is the number one thing that
> robs power.  A unhooked vacuum line to the distributor will not cause any
> damage, just lower your idle a little bit.
> 
> Aaron Johnson
> 72 TR6 CC84967
> 
> ----------
> > From: The Romagni's <mrdr@buckeyeweb.com>
> > To: triumphs@autox.team.net
> > Subject: TR6 vacuum retard
> > Date: Friday, March 07, 1997 5:35 PM
> >
> > Hi all;
> >
> > On my 74 TR6, all of the anti-pollution equipment was removed by the
> > DPO. Not a licensing problem here in Ohio, however I have a question.
> > With the removal also went the thermostatic valve in the radiator water
> > line. With that gone, so too is the line to the retard unit on the
> > distributor. Obviously the car idles too fast.
> >
> > Can I simply re-connect this line to one of the vacuum line's on the
> > carbs? Or was vacuum being applied based on the water temp?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Marty Romagni
> > 74 TR6
Aaron,

I don't want to rob the engine. My TR was lacking plumbing and I was
interested in what the orginal intent of the retard via the thermostatic
unit was.

Marty Romagni
74 TR6

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>