>
>Hello Group -
>
>This week's issue of Barron's has a little article on vintage cars. Of
>course the article approaches the topic from an investment angle (Barron's is
>a Wall Street periodical), but there are some interesting insights
>nonetheless. The author rates the TR6 as a buy (solely in terms of chance of
>appreciation...monetary, not aesthetic). "Inexpensive, great fun, not as
>primitive as more expensive older TRs (which means it's primitive anyway,
>almost junky). But cheap English sports cars from the sixties are hot."
>
>If I could just get my hands on that author's neck about that "junky" crack.
>
>I love my TR, but would never consider it an investment!....Besides, I ain't
>sellin' it, especially to no Wall Street wanker.
>
>Carl Huppert
>75 TR6
>
>
Carl,
Maybe you should reconsider wanting to "wring"the authors kneck
How many weekends have you NOT worked on your Triumph?
I however disagree with the term "junk" is as much as it should be dubbed
"organized chaos".
Tony R.
"GT6s"
###
|