| To: | dbinkley@argotech.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 289 vs. 302 |
| From: | TigerCoupe@aol.com |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Sep 1998 19:31:19 EDT |
In a message dated 9/25/98 4:26:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, dbinkley@argotech.com writes: > what are the pro's and con's of going with a > 289 versus a 302? I'm asking more from the point of view of fitting things > up and period look. >From my point of view, there isn't a nickel's worth of difference between them, or a 260 for that matter. They all fit and look the same. Period. Look. Dick Barker |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 289 vs. 302, Dave Binkley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | GT for Sale, A. C. Tynes |
| Previous by Thread: | 289 vs. 302, Dave Binkley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 289 vs. 302, MWood24020 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |