spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stripped oil sump bolt threads in aluminum filler piece at

To: Nick Moseley <nmoseley@dccnet.com>
Subject: Re: Stripped oil sump bolt threads in aluminum filler piece at
From: Henry Stike <stiker2126@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 05:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
We didn't go the helicoiil route as in time some of
those pull out. It was easier to just drill & tap to a
hair size larger thread...

PS We also like the wood filler pieces.... LOL!
Engineering at its best!

Don & Henry



--- Nick Moseley <nmoseley@dccnet.com> wrote:

> Apologies for the cross-posting.
> 
>  
> 
> In the continuing saga of the engine purchased at a
> good price, fully
> rebuilt, I checked main bearings and they were
> indeed brand new. Ahh, that's
> nice.
> 
> However, the threads into the aluminum block called
> a "filler piece", at the
> front of the engine holding the two front sump (oil
> pan) bolts, are well and
> truly stripped.
> 
>  
> 
> As I understand it, the options are:
> 
> -helicoil to replace the threads, means added
> expense of a helicoil kit,
> plus the (very real) possibility that I'd drill the
> new holes at an angle
> 
> -new aluminum block, but I recall this coming up
> before, so it must be a
> weak point
> 
> -new metal (instead of aluminum) block (filler
> piece), I remember seeing
> these on e-bay in the past, but can't find them
> lately. Anyone know the
> seller?
> 
> Any preferences? One misgiving about the metal block
> relates to why Triumph
> would use aluminum in the first place if it didn't
> need it, but there is not
> always a rhyme to their reason.
> 
> Comments welcome.
> Nick Moseley
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>