spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: seatbelts

To: "Andrew Mace" <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>, "Joe Curry" <spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: Re: seatbelts
From: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:45:42 -0500
My 68 Mustang has shoulder belts attached to the roof, my 67 Mustang has
only lap belts.  "FT"
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
To: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Cc: Fred Thomas <vafred@erols.com>; <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: seatbelts


> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Joe Curry wrote:
>
> > Having just attended Traffic school (don't ask), I can say that in
> > Arizona, cars older than 1972 are not required to have seatbelts.  The
> > reason given is that was the first year that belts were required by
> > law.  I thought it was earlier than that!
>
> It was earlier. I'm almost positive that lap belts for all seat positions
> were mandatory by the 1967 model year if not before. And I am positive
> that front outboard shoulder belts were required on cars assembled for
> sale in the US on or after January 1, 1968. Note that there was some sort
> of exemption on the shoulder belts for convertibles, which is why not all
> Spitfires and TRs had lap/shoulder belts until the early 1970s.
>
> There is other confusion in that some states required belts earlier than
> others and, in some cases, well before any Federal standards took effect.
>
> --Andy
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> * Andrew Mace, President and                *
> *   10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Consultant *
> * Vintage Triumph Register <www.vtr.org>    *
> * amace@unix2.nysed.gov                     *
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>