spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: seatbelts

To: Fred Thomas <vafred@erols.com>, "'Joe Curry'" <spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: RE: seatbelts
From: "Banbury, Terrence" <Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:10:43 -0500
I went to traffic school recently myself.  Oops.  It was informative, but I
plan on not going again.
Terry

> ----------
> From:         Joe Curry[SMTP:spitlist@gte.net]
> Reply To:     Joe Curry
> Sent:         Thursday, March 09, 2000 8:39 PM
> To:   Fred Thomas
> Cc:   spitfires@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: seatbelts
> 
> 
> Having just attended Traffic school (don't ask), I can say that in
> Arizona, cars older than 1972 are not required to have seatbelts.  The
> reason given is that was the first year that belts were required by
> law.  I thought it was earlier than that!
> 
> Joe
> 
> Fred Thomas wrote:
> > 
> > June, 1964, seat belts became mandatory standard equipment, the first
> year
> > or 2, they were not mandatory for the rear seats, even though most
> companys
> > did install them.   "FT"
> 
> -- 
> "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
>  -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>