Don't places like large offices, schools, and airports have dozens or
hundreds of access points with the same SSID?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Mike Rambour <email@example.com> wrote:
> While its true that any modern device can store access credentials for
> multiple connections, my house wifi barely reaches the garage, its usually
> down to one or 2 bars in the garage and my phone will try and stay
> connected to it, I have to manually tell it to change to the garage wifi
> each time I go in the garage. They have different names but I had not
> thought of making them the same name and will try that, it sounds like it
> should work but knowing how things work it will likely confuse the phone.
> In the house my computers are all wired, so no worries about jumping to
> the weak signal, only my phone and my wife's phone are wifi.
> On 6/16/2015 1:13 PM, David Hillman wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Peter Murray wrote:
>>> - Configure its SSID and encryption the same as your main access point
>>> you can just transparently go from one to the other)
>> I'm not sure that's a great idea. If the house signal reaches the
>> shop, even weakly ( or vice versa ), you'll have two networks with the same
>> name available. I bet that'll cause more problems than it'll solve.
>> Any modern device can store access credentials for dozens of wireless
>> networks, so there's minimal advantage to naming them the same anyway.
>> Also, from a troubleshooting perspective, two names would be better.
>> Say you are in the shop -- or outside on the property -- and your
>> connection sucks. Unbeknownst to you, your shop WAP crashed, and your
>> computer jumped to the weak house signal. You won't be able to tell them
>> apart from the client device if they are named the same.
>> David Hillman