buick-rover-v8
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 300 heads

To: Curtis Hunter <amy_curt@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: 300 heads
From: David Kernberger <dkern@napanet.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:59:03 -0700
4/16/02

Curtis et al,

        The question still is whether there is a misalignment of the intake
manifold/valley cover gasket that is not mentioned in any of the articles,
including the March, 1985 Hot Rod Magazine one.  Jon did a test fit and saw
a problem.  I cannot do this check myself, but am very much interested in
the answer.  I am aware that these heads have been used for years on these
engines.  I hope to do this myself in the near future.  So, once again, is
there a problem and, if so, what can be done to solve it?

----------------------------------------------------

>You have the Hot Rod March 1986 article?
>c.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "David Kernberger" <dkern@napanet.net>
>To: "Curtis Hunter" <amy_curt@pacbell.net>
>Cc: <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>; <buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:31 PM
>Subject: Re: 300 heads
>
>
>> 4/15/02
>>
>> Curtis,
>>
>> Thanks for the response but it does not address the question that
>> Jon and I have asked.  That question is how to get the 215 valley
>> cover/manifold gasket to match the intake ports on the 300 heads when they
>> are mounted on the aluminum block???  I haven't checked this fit myself,
>> but Jon apparently has.  Nothing I have ever seen written about the use of
>> these heads addresses this problem.  Is there actually a problem??  If so,
>> what does one do about it??  Would love to hear the details.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Dave Kernberger
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>
>> >The 300 heads will fit the 215, 3.5 to 4.6L Rover.  The main difference
>> >between the 215 and 300 Buick engines are the height and width of the
>block.
>> >The 300 is about 1" taller on the same degree "V"... also meaning that
>the
>> >intake is wider to cover the added distance between the banks of
>cylinders.
>> >Yes, the 300 intake has no need of a galley pan, as it seals both front
>and
>> >rear lifter galleys to the block.
>>
    c.
>>
>> >----- Original Message -----
>> >From: "jon (by way of David Kernberger)" <jonaxt@pacifier.com>
>> >To: <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>; <buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 6:42 PM
>> >Subject: 300 heads
>> >
>> >
>> >> 4/3/02
>> >>
>> >> Hello all,
>> >>
>> >> I haven'seen any reponse to this query from Jon Axt (below).  I too
>> >> would be interested in hearing anything anybody might have to say.  In
>all
>> >> discussions I have seen, the issue isn't addressed, leading me to
>believe
>> >> there was no problem.  Is there???
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> David Kernberger
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> So, how does one fit 300 heads to a 215 or Rover block? I placed the
>215
>> >tin
>> >> cover against a 300 head and the inlet ports don't quite line up. If
>you
>> >> trim the tin cover you'll remove part of the seal embossing. Jon

///
///  buick-rover-v8@autox.team.net mailing list
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>