> Another solution is to simply raise entry fees.
you may lower attendance, but you will not lose many newbies. more of the
serious people will be inclined to drive to sac where you can get 10 runs
for less money. one reason i want to drive in SFR is because the high level
of competition makes me improve faster.
i would prefer to have more events. i am willing to co-chair event(s) to
help make this happen.
comments?
-james creasy
Slip Angle Cobrasports www.klio.net/cobra
BAPOC www.klio.net/probe
----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Weinstock <weinstro@hotmail.com>
To: <Sherry.Grantz@Aspect.com>; <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 10:29 AM
Subject: RE: Round 14
> >Actually. John, after going through all the new registrations Monday
night
> >before giving them to Pilar I found we had 37 new registrations - some of
> >these were +spouse and +family.
> >
> >This means we have signed up at least 100 new members since the Members
> >Only
> >Rule went into effect.
> >
> >Registration at this event was an absolute zoo. We don't have the staff
or
> >time to register 250 people and initiate a couple dozen people to SCCA
> >(explain how the event works, figure out what class their car is in and
> >when
> >they run) at every event.
> >
> >I personally think we have all the people we can handle for now and will
> >advocate Members Only for slush and No New Members accepted at event
> >registration.
>
> That's an interesting idea. If we are continuously at capacity, then
another
> solution would be to require some form of preregistration, and/or a
maximum
> cap on participants.
>
> Another solution is to simply raise entry fees. If we're always having
high
> attendance, that's because we're giving an incredible good deal. Demand
and
> supply. $10 might make a noticable difference in attendance.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
|