Sorry for the bandwidth, but I thought the response should to the
the same address list as the question.
> "Grantz, Sherry" wrote:
> >
> > OK, so the way I read it, Michael Clements is calling me a "self-righteous
> > volunteer" and a "jerk". Am I missing anything here?
>
> Perhaps you are missing something. I just re-read my message and
> didn't find any name calling. I described a general type of
> person (the self-righteous volunteer), observed some negative and
> some positive (does useful work nobody else wants to do)
> characteristics of that type, with the implicit suggestion that
> you might be such a type. I'm not the only one who observed the
> fact that the tone of your message matched the description, so
> while I believe the association is correct, I admit that it is
> based only on circumstantial evidence.
|