autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest

To: autox mailing list <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Forwarded: clarifications to FM exhaust protest
From: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:26:38 -0400 (EDT)
Howdy,

On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 TeamZ06@aol.com wrote:
> You were not sent away from the event, but rather penalized for an
> obvious rule infraction.  Your exhaust exceeded the very specific rule
> which set the length limit at a firm 24" from the rear axle
> centerline; there is no allowance for exceeding that length.  I fully
> believe your explanation and am not accusing you of intentionally
> cheating, but the car did not meet the specifications called out in
> the rulebook.  It was your responsibility to ensure the vehicle met
> all of the requirements.  It wasn't like you were only a smidgeon
> over, but almost 3" too long.
> 
> I'm sorry to hear about drivers not wanting to return to Nationals,
> but if they don't consider rule enforcement a necessary part of the
> event process then it's probably in everybody's best interest for them
> not to return.  I'm also sorry that you made a mistake that resulted
> in dashing your shot at a National Championship, but it's not right to
> put the blame on anyone but yourself.  IMO you followed one mistake
> with another by not appealing the severity of the penalty, but it is
> certainly every driver's right to pack up and leave the event if they
> so desire.  If anyone is truly a contender for the championship then
> logic would suggest that you make the car legal and prove your point
> while pursuing the appeal process, then come back the following year
> to prove it again.
> 
> FWIW, some people feel the subjective time penalties should be
> eliminated altogether; either you're legal to the tee or you're DSQ!  
> Time penalties were only enacted as an attempt to be fair, but it
> would appear that the SEB simply opened pandora's box because
> ironically the only thing that results is criticism about how unfair
> the penalty is.  My apology for sounding harsh, but rules is rules,
> especially so at the National Championship event.

The part of this whole deal that I don't understand is why the penalty was
so harsh.  Let's face it, a DSQ or a 10 second penalty are _both_
essentially disqualifications.

Given the nature of the penalties for other stuff, late to grid being one
of the main ones, this seemed _way_ too harsh.

So am I missing something?  Muffler / Stinger length on a two stroke
exhaust doesn't do much, if anything, to power output (as opposed to the
pipe itself, which has a _large_ effect).  I've also heard a _ton_ of
people bitching about two stroke exhaust notes, so you'd think an attempt
to quiet them would be received well.

Of course, rules is rules and all, but it _did_ seem a bit over the top to
dq these folks.  What am I missing?

Mark

(Not to mention... Stingers can be removed in about 2 minutes with no side
effects.  I fail to understand someone who chooses to protest their
competitors rather than speak with them prior to their runs and give them
a chance to fix the problem.  IMHO, that person has lost sight of what
autox (or any type of competition) is all about.)

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>