autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Supra Classing, was: SM PAX

To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Supra Classing, was: SM PAX
From: "Larry Joffe" <spdrcr5@bigfoot.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:43:27 -0500
Everything is remaining status quo for the 2001 season.

Just about every SM Competitor wants the 944 Series to be able to run in SM.
The problem is Howard Duncan and the SEB has already made a ruling and it
can't be changed until we get some data to back up those cars being allowed
into the class.  The proposal is for local clubs to run an SM2 which will
basically allow just about all of the non-SM cars to compete and then after
the season determine how those cars would have done in relation to SM.  If
the 944 Series of cars would not have walked all of the regular SM cars then
Howard would in all probability recommend the 944 Series to be allowed into
SM.

It is going to take at least this season to work it all out.

You are right about the Supra though.  If it is allowed in, then the 944 and
300ZX should be too!  Lots of letters went to Howard and the SEB expressing
just that point.  :)

Larry Joffe
SM #27/127
2000 Audi TT Quattro



--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: owner-autox@autox.team.net
--> [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net]On
--> Behalf Of Matt Murray
--> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:35 PM
--> Cc: autox@autox.team.net
--> Subject: Supra Classing, was: SM PAX
-->
-->
--> Is the Supra still being allowed to run in SM, or is it
--> going to join the
--> 944 in that it doesn't fit the SM profile? Or is the 944
--> going to join SM,
--> since it is very similar in profile to the Supra? DG?
-->
--> Matt Murray
-->
--> mattm@optonline.net
-->
--> ----- Original Message -----
--> > Aside from a cat, what makes the CSP cars illegal?
--> > My main point is that during the development of a class,
--> you must err on
--> > the side of caution.  That is clearly not the case in SM.
-->  You take a
--> > 'mid-pack' CSP Civic and send it in against SM and you
--> are in the hunt or
--> > on top - currently.  With more preparation, that should
--> change - but when
--> > does that preparation change?  Is it going to take a year
--> of a well
--> > developed SM car killing the PAX to reset it for the
--> FOLLOWING year?  Who
--> > does that hurt?  Everyone but SM.  Let SM feel the pain
--> for right now and
--> > then the majority doesn't suffer.
--> > Besides, if you set the PAX artificially LOW, then how do
--> you know when
--> you
--> > are where you need to be in terms of development?
--> Granted, it is a
--> > 'best-guess' deal with a new preparation level but you at
--> least have to
--> > start ahead of where we have already established history
--> - like CSP
--> > factors.
--> >
--> > AB
-->

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>