Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Mg\-t\]\s+oil\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Mg\-t\]\s+oil\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Mg-t] oil (score: 1): Author: Richard Lindsay <richardolindsay@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:30:16 -0500; Hello Friends, I'm sure oil threads cause as much hate-n-discontent here as on any other List, so I write with a degree of trepidation. Actually, I seek only your opinion, not science. Please share y; /html/mg-t/2013-06/msg00027.html (8,746 bytes)
2. Re: [Mg-t] oil (score: 1): Author: Tuck Southworth <tuck.southworth@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:56:07 -0400; Rick, You will receive many opinions as this subject has been much discussed on the forum over the years. Heres my 2c's I agree that you should use 90 hypoid for the steering rack, gearbox and diff.; /html/mg-t/2013-06/msg00028.html (11,023 bytes)
3. Re: [Mg-t] oil (score: 1): Author: Ted Jackson <ted@the-jacksons.ca>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:10:29 -0400; FWIW in my 1951 MGTD I use Redline MT90 in the gearbox, Redline 75W90 in the differential, and I add a can of GM EOS part # 992869 with every oil change, where I use Castrol 20W50 whenever I find it; /html/mg-t/2013-06/msg00029.html (9,908 bytes)
4. Re: [Mg-t] oil (score: 1): Author: Mike E <redscirocco@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:55:55 -0400; I have no argument with using 90 weight hypoid in the steering rack, but according to one of Richard Knudsen's publications, the reason oil was used in the steering rack was because grease would hard; /html/mg-t/2013-06/msg00030.html (14,373 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]