Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*removeable\s+Rearview\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*removeable\s+Rearview\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Jeffrey Lloyd" <jslz3@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 08:39:21 PST; Yea laugh if you want to but after 2 years of owning my Z3 when installing the in car cam for McCamey I noticed Hey my Rearview mirror has a release latch, It is designed to be removed and put back o; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01276.html (7,637 bytes)
2. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 16:32:51 EST; Just undo it and keep it in the car. M Sipe; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01283.html (7,913 bytes)
3. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Debbie Stohn <dstohn@mediaone.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:16:52 -0500; Jeff... Just curious... why do you want to remove it? Is it poorly placed or are you talking about removing just during the autoxing? Debbie; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01287.html (8,180 bytes)
4. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 16:48:57 -0800; Despite the fact that my M Coupe has the same kind of latch, and has a mirror about 50% bigger than yours and is an absolute accident waiting to happen when driving on the street (can you say "blind; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01289.html (8,719 bytes)
5. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 16:50:49 -0800; Ahh, here we go, from Jerry Mouton's web site: http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/car_class_stock_rules.html#s13 13.2 Bodywork A. Accessories, gauges, indicators, lights and other appearance, comfort an; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01290.html (9,972 bytes)
6. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Don and Sharon Roberts <cobra89@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 18:30:21 -0800; How 'bout removing the mirror and storing in the glovebox? Same weight, same area (front) of car. Only a non-Oscar Meyer would protest! Sharon Roberts; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01291.html (8,445 bytes)
7. RE: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:06:14 -0600; -- The real sad part here, is that someone, somewhere, at some time, threw a fit because someone without the OEM mirror beat him. Mirrors obviously increase handling. [Y]es [N]o Mirrors obviously in; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01292.html (8,953 bytes)
8. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Bret Dodson <bret@serv.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:10:56 -0800 (PST); Hmm. If it has a latch, and is designed to be removed by the operator, shouldn't it be a legal configuration in which to run the car? Is mention in the owner's manual neccessary for it to be legal, o; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01293.html (10,172 bytes)
9. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:07:41 -0800; In some cars, the answer to this question is a very clear YES, my car being one of them. If you doubt me, go take a test-drive in a BMW M Roadster or BMW M Coupe. Jeff's car is pretty bad itself, the; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01294.html (8,239 bytes)
10. RE: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:19:30 -0600; Well, since a rear view mirror is not a legally required device if you have two side mirrors, I dont see why it cant be removed because of the safety factor when you remove the mirror itself. A drive; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01295.html (9,397 bytes)
11. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:14:49 -0800; Listen guys, It can't be removed because the rules explicitely state that it can't. Josh; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01296.html (9,574 bytes)
12. RE: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:23:22 -0600; -- I know, just searching (very hard) for the logic behind it.; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01297.html (8,421 bytes)
13. RE: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Bret Dodson <bret@serv.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 17:40:02 -0800 (PST); I would argue that if the BMW literature says the mirror can be removed, the car can be run without it in place. For justification, I submit the following portions of 13. Stock category. "Except for; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01298.html (9,513 bytes)
14. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Ron and Angie" <nottingham@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:29:01 -0500; But, if he puts the mirror in the glove compartment, or some other place in the car, then it wouldn't have been removed. Do the rules say anything about repositioning anything? Technically the mirro; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01300.html (9,780 bytes)
15. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Rick Brown <rikracer@cwix.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:09:39 -0800; I used to always remove the mirror on my BSP 240Z, which snaps on/off, and stuff it behind the passenger seat just for greater visability. Also "updated" to later model 280Z windshield wipers for th; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01301.html (9,139 bytes)
16. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:15:02 -0500; Once again, just like always, everyone (not just Mark) seems to think it's about some miniscule amount of weight rather than a real competitive advantage (better visibility towards the right front co; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01302.html (8,701 bytes)
17. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 22:20:24 -0800; Well, maybe not. Someone could simply have written a letter to Denver requesting clarification. Not everything that's illegal will result in a DSQ it's protested. This is the sort of thing that would; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01303.html (9,587 bytes)
18. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 23:44:31 -0600; Check your owners manual. Does it say you can drive the car without the mirror? This is akin to removable seats and roof racks. If the owner's manual says you can remove it and drive it that way on; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01308.html (9,564 bytes)
19. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:00:04 -0600; Ooooh, nice try! == 13. STOCK Preamble: Except for modifications authorized below, Stock Category cars must be run as specified by the factory with only standard equipment as defined by these Rules.; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01312.html (9,998 bytes)
20. Re: removeable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 23:55:20 -0600; I don't read it as a weight issue at all. It's clearly a visibility issue, and hence a performance advantage. But the mirror is designed (at least this is how I've heard it) to be easilly removable w; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01314.html (9,560 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]