Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*opinions\s+on\s+parking\s+at\s+Nationals\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*opinions\s+on\s+parking\s+at\s+Nationals\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Sup4speed@aol.com; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 00:45:54 EDT; Hi All: Ok, a bit of a change of topic from the sadness, the criticism, the classes. So, what about that paddock patrol ? I thought the parking was improved over years past, but wanted to hear how ot; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00482.html (8,516 bytes)
2. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:32:41 -0500; My Opinion - it was great. And it will get better! Phil Osborne and his crew (even the knuckledragger; perhaps especially the knuckledragger, who put in hours above and beyond the call) did a fantast; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00483.html (10,537 bytes)
3. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone aka ConeKiller" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:40:45 -0400; I personally liked the way the paddock spots worked. I am for one AGAINST pre-reserving prior to the event, unless those spots reserved are at the back of the paddock. I can't tell you how annoying i; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00491.html (10,338 bytes)
4. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Hottvr@aol.com; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:17:19 EDT; << What you suggest giving preferential parking to the size of the region, is NOT a good idea. I don't want to have to join a SUPER MEGA region to park near the front. >> Well Dude Theres always room; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00494.html (8,524 bytes)
5. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Sup4speed@aol.com; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 02:22:58 EDT; I'm unclear as to why reserved parking is interpreted as preferential to the large regions. It seems to me that an individual (one truck/trailer) would have a better chance parking toward the front (; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00495.html (9,312 bytes)
6. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 13:24:48 -0500; People want to paddock together with their friends. I have no problem with reserved parking for a group as long as each space is individually allotted to a specific driver. No "we want 20 spaces for; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00504.html (11,258 bytes)
7. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:47:27 -0400; I disagree with that, Rocky. My feeling is that the new paddock strategy, in the end, had very little effect. Let me be clear -- I think that Phil and his crew did an outstanding job in implementing; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00517.html (9,490 bytes)
8. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <mark@sirota.org>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:51:57 -0400; Clearly spoken as a member of a jumbo, geographically isolated region (San Francisco, right?) Out here in NEDiv, at least, most regions are geographically and numerically tiny. One runs events hosted; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00518.html (9,151 bytes)
9. RE: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Richard Atkins" <richarda@npclabels.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:52:55 -0500; I disagree with Mark's disagreement. I felt that this year was much better than past several. In 2000 we arrived early afternoon on Sunday, ended up against rope in very back, all else was filled, on; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00519.html (10,033 bytes)
10. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Sup4speed@aol.com; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:42:16 EDT; Actually it doesn't matter that much to me where I paddock or with whom. My concern as a new participant to Nationals (this was my 2nd) is finding a parking spot for my truck/trailer/car. Kinda like; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00520.html (9,422 bytes)
11. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 18:21:09 -0500; I was under the presumption that a certain number of spots were planned on being freed up after Wednesday due to people leaving. Not everyone stays all week. Is this not being done? Can you ask compe; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00526.html (8,955 bytes)
12. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:04:33 -0500; To a great extent that is true. The real glut happens Wednesday. Tuesday-Wednesday drivers are still competing. Even many of those done don't plan to leave until Thursday at the earliest (never mind; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00532.html (11,347 bytes)
13. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: Eric Linnhoff <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:59:37 -0700; -- Original Message -- to == Egg-zactly. As one of Phil's Deputies I had the honor of participating in the new paddock process. From my interactions with fellow competitors, over 99% of the folks see; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00534.html (11,294 bytes)
14. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 10:29:11 -0500; I know, how about a lottery system of sorts. We take reservations for individual parking spots in a row, but you just don't know which row they are in until you actually get to Topeka. That way the l; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00544.html (9,070 bytes)
15. RE: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 13:24:12 -0500; Or, how about if we make a penalty for unused space? If you save a space and it doesn't get used by an actual entrant you owe the club one race tire. . . Sure some would trade spaces for tires, but a; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00549.html (8,414 bytes)
16. RE: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Glen Thompson" <glen.thompson@home.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:21:10 -0400; Why not just charge a reservation fee, mostly refundable when everyone shows up. Something like $20 per space, payable in advance or by the first person. Once everyone is there, $15 per space is refu; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00554.html (9,247 bytes)
17. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Rand E" <rande@mwis.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:11:56 -0500; How about first come first serve based on when you send in your entry? The earlier you send in your entry the better choices you have. Could be another line on the entry form for where you would like; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00555.html (9,741 bytes)
18. Re: opinions on parking at Nationals (score: 1): Author: "Craig Straub" <straubc@apci.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:03:57 -0500; Well lets go crazy!!!!!!!! The idea of parking fees is great but how about $50.00 per space (including trailer length) only 1 width wide for the first row. This would allow the entrant to park in thi; /html/autox/2001-09/msg00558.html (10,417 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]