Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Removable\s+rearview\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Removable\s+rearview\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. RE: removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 23:45:35 -0600; -- If the owners manual states that you should observe all local DOT regulations, and following THAT if you have two side mirrors, you are not required to have a windscreen rear-view mirror (in most; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01309.html (7,904 bytes)
2. Re: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:46:41 -0500; Doesn't it strike anyone as odd that we would have a rule in place that prohibits the improvement of _visibility out of the car_? "Gee, I'm sorry I ran over that corner worker franticly waving that r; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01325.html (7,540 bytes)
3. RE: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 08:00:27 -0700; It stuck me as being odd, but ive endured the party-line 'sorry, rules' responses so far. A couple of ppl in here have expressed private humor in this, and they are on the list of privileged humans w; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01326.html (8,499 bytes)
4. Re: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: Jack Hilton III <JackHilton@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:16:57 -0500; I think it is the "Rules are rules" mentality . If they say you can remove this for that reason , then someone else will argue that you should be allowed to remove this other thing , and so on . Give; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01330.html (8,591 bytes)
5. RE: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:18:49 -0500; Thank [insert Deity of choice] that my car doesn't come with a clip-on, eight-inch hardened steel spike mounted in the center of the steering wheel, 'cause with rules interpretations like this one,; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01331.html (7,782 bytes)
6. Re: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Jeffrey Lloyd" <jslz3@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 07:43:13 PST; Now I agree if it says I cant so be it, But I glanced in my '99 rule book and did not find that statement, I did see it on the web page? I take it the rule book is right there for it falls under the; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01334.html (8,291 bytes)
7. RE: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:12:55 -0800; If it's really not safe in the structured environment of an autocross, how in the WORLD did you get the car to the event in one piece on a regular basis? Trailer queens need not apply. KeS; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01345.html (8,553 bytes)
8. RE: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:17:09 -0800; Well, it required a rules change to allow you to disable (not remove) the explosive device mounted in the center of the steering wheel... KeS (though your comparison of an overly large mirror to an e; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01347.html (8,888 bytes)
9. Re: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 11:58:09 -0600; clip-on, steering wheel, allowed to remove WARNING! HUMOR ALERT! HUMOR IMPAIRED PLEASE DELETE FORTHWITH! Here's a bit of dialogue that may serve to illuminate: Propono: My car is so unsafe, unreliabl; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01351.html (9,383 bytes)
10. Re: Removable Rearview (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 13:49:17 -0500; I got it - very Socratic of you. ;) I also understand where you're coming from, but I submit that there is a difference 'twix "unsafe" and "unreliable" and/or "inconvenient". If the mirror is so lar; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01355.html (9,178 bytes)
11. Re: Removable rearview (score: 1): Author: joshlocklear@juno.com; Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 22:38:39 -0500; As I read all of these messages, I am amazed that there are actually people who protest this sort of thing. I'm a rookie auto-xer with Ohio Valley Region, and all of our events are pretty laid back.; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01378.html (8,791 bytes)
12. Re: Removable rearview (score: 1): Author: RacerRay52@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 02:22:38 EST; << If I decide to attend a CenDiv divisional, will I be attacked by rabid rulebook lawyers citing passages of the rulebook that I don't even know about? What's it really like? Some opinion on the "at; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01389.html (8,312 bytes)
13. Re:Removable rearview (score: 1): Author: joshlocklear@juno.com; Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:40:18 -0500; I'd like to thank all the people who've replied to my question about the "atmosphere" at different levels of competition. It's good to know that since I'm not too competitive, I won't have to worry t; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01432.html (8,059 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]