Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+0\.120\"\s+really\s+get\s+9\.5\:1\s+compression\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Does\s+0\.120\"\s+really\s+get\s+9\.5\:1\s+compression\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:29:23 -0800; Well, lets see: Remember that I have a 1974 motor with a stock compression ratio of 7.75:1, so I need to go a looooong ways to get to 9.5:1. The milling of the head took the combustion chamber volum; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00166.html (9,112 bytes)
2. Re: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bullard" <mbullard@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:39:17 -1000; Oh... now I get it... I think it's time for another egg nog. Merry Christmas everyone. Mark Bullard -- Original Message -- of 44.5cc is Head (CCV). 2.96".; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00169.html (9,485 bytes)
3. RE: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:30:20 -0800; Didn't measure the head thickness. All measurements were relative to the volume of the combustion chamber. According to Goodparts, the head thickness would be about 3.415" or so. Goodparts compressi; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00206.html (11,012 bytes)
4. RE: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanselman" <tr6@kc4sw.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:32:53 -0800; This may be a dumb question, but what is the difference in taking material off of the head vs. the block? Isn't the result the same, a smaller combustion chamber? I am confused (again) Steve 72 TR6; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00208.html (8,425 bytes)
5. RE: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: Timothy Holbrook <tjh173@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:56:57 -0800 (PST); Due to the shape of the combustion chamber, you have to take more material off the block in order to get the same comp ratio as taking a lesser amount of material off the head. However, that being sa; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00210.html (9,061 bytes)
6. RE: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:38:49 -0800; You are forgetting the head gasket, which is 0.035" or so thick. Common practice when modifying engines for power is to "0 deck" the block, i.e. decking the block so that the piston crowns are flush; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00213.html (11,252 bytes)
7. RE: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Shawn J. Loseke" <sloseke@holly.colostate.edu>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:48:33 -0700; Cut below the highest piston height and it will crash into the head the first time you crank it. Whoa yourself Greg, nice cautionairy advice but; You can cut the deck below the top of the piston with; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00215.html (9,867 bytes)
8. Re: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kai@radiohead.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:53:18 -0500; Hi Tim and others, I only see a few pitfalls with removing material from the block (other than it is generally frowned upon). 1) It is much easier to remove your cylinder head while the motor is ins; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00216.html (9,835 bytes)
9. Re: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Kai M. Radicke" <kai@radiohead.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:08:56 -0500; I wrote earlier: My reasons against removing material from the block were specifically in regards to the measurement mentioned in the subject. 0.120" is a lot to remove from a block. As Vance and oth; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00224.html (9,309 bytes)
10. RE: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: "Shawn J. Loseke" <sloseke@holly.colostate.edu>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:21:34 -0700; Sorry but this rambles a bit... Well all this has got me thinking that my CR might not be as high as I thought. I measured the pistons height out of the block myself when reassembling the engine. The; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00245.html (10,789 bytes)
11. Re: Does 0.120" really get 9.5:1 compression? (score: 1): Author: YeOldEd@aol.com; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:22:27 EST; By Jove, I think I've got it! "Deck the heads with boughs of squish............." Maybe not. MC to all, from Mike N and the MoneypiTR; /html/6pack/2003-12/msg00249.html (7,863 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]