Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jamies@mrj.com: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

201. Re: "ZX2 S/R"...anybody seen one? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 08:27:54 -0500
a package. like Depends on whether the SEB classifies it differently than the standard ZX-2 -- if not, then they're all lumped together. Jamie '92 Prelude Si (thousands made) Speed Demon Racing http:
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00269.html (8,796 bytes)

202. Re: a question (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 19:05:21 -0400
Try walking the course backwards once -- that is, facing backwards. A line through a corner should set you up to make maximum use of the straight parts, and sometimes it's more obvious working throug
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00321.html (8,176 bytes)

203. Re: ST @ Nationals - current rules.....? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:46:36 -0400
No -- not this month. Jamie '92 Prelude Si (maybe migrating to DSP?) Speed Demon Racing http://www.mindspring.com/~jsculerati/sdr
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00816.html (7,370 bytes)

204. Re: SP Proposal (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 17:24:16 -0500
Yes -- the proposal was in the May issue -- this issue (July) doesn't address it further. Like the question asked. Jamie '92 Prelude Si (maybe DSP?) Speed Demon Racing http://www.mindspring.com/~jscu
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00888.html (7,385 bytes)

205. Re: Can I reverse the traction control switch??? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 17:31:50 -0500
Fiddling with the switch is just asking to be protest bait -- what's problem with simply turning the system off before the run? Jamie '92 Prelude Si Speed Demon Racing http://www.mindspring.com/~jscu
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00890.html (8,227 bytes)

206. Re: Official ruling from the SEB??? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 19:40:40 -0400
If I'm reading the rulebook correctly, the only real way is for the ruling to be published in FASTRAK. The SCCA reserves the right to revise these rules.... Changes of this nature will normally becom
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01022.html (8,526 bytes)

207. Re: tire storage (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 21:34:23 -0400
It probably doesn't matter much, but in the off-season, I lay 'em on their sides -- that distributes the load across a greater area. During the season, it definitely doesn't matter -- after all, you
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01113.html (7,577 bytes)

208. Re: Tire siping (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 22:22:32 -0400
I don't see that this would gain you anything on dry pavement. If I understand siping correctly, it's to provide more edges to break up the water film under the tire in wet and snowy conditions -- th
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00156.html (7,021 bytes)

209. Re: Tire (A) siping (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 08:35:46 -0500
prevent is No, but it's an intriguing idea -- improved traction by application of heat to the pavement.... :) Jamie '92 Prelude Si Speed Demon Racing http://www.mindspring.com/~jsculerati/sdr
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00168.html (7,585 bytes)

210. Re: Drove an Elise (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 19:19:59 -0400
fun could be they COULD a That's it -- add weight and put a wheezy GM 4-banger in it. Just so long as they don't claim kinship with anything Lotus -- Colin Chapman will hit redline in his grave. engi
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00200.html (9,091 bytes)

211. Re: Fieros -- love 'em or not (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 09:34:47 -0500
as I'll admit, the two Fieros I've driven were '84 and '86 models. And although Lotus designed the '88 chassis, IMO the *car* was still overwieght, which is a mortal sin for sports cars, especially L
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00220.html (8,990 bytes)

212. Re: 99 Civic Si classing (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 08:52:11 -0500
Not surprising -- by my observations, the top DS, ES and GS times tend to converge on many courses. Several years ago, the Civic Si and the newer Preludes ('92-up) were both DS cars -- they were move
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00384.html (9,539 bytes)

213. Re: 99 Civic Si classing (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 14:02:55 -0500
If I remember correctly, the Del Sol VTEC started out in DS and migrated downward -- 2500 lbs was too much for that peaky engine to lug around corners. By comparison, '98 Civics 100 - 200 lbs lighter
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00412.html (7,425 bytes)

214. Re: delSol VTEC (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:31:11 -0500
that It's true -- and not all that surprising for a semi-monocoque body structure. Any time you cut holes in it, you compromise the structural rigidity -- which has to be recovered via extra bracing.
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00473.html (7,804 bytes)

215. Re: ST rules clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 22:48:52 -0400
up competitor after a some The earlier question refered to accessory pulleys only. From the SIIR: 14.10 Engine and Drive Train U. Any accessory pulleys and belts of the same type (e.g., V-belt, serpe
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00494.html (9,023 bytes)

216. Re: delSol VTEC (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 10:01:56 -0500
Hmm...depending on where I look, I get figures from 2457 lbs to 2612 lbs for the '99 Si Coupe and 2353 to 2510 lbs for the EX sedan. Someone's using Huck and CHuck products on their test cars.... Jam
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00509.html (7,613 bytes)

217. Re: 4 wheel steering -- bad? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:34:14 -0400
There are no particular reasons for or against the 4WS option, other than the increased weight -- something on the order of 50 lbs -- and maybe not even that, since the computer module and the extra
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00569.html (8,156 bytes)

218. Re: 4 wheel steering -- bad? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 00:54:18 -0400
Maybe -- but I can't prove it one way or another. I've never run into a 4WS car at an autocross, and all the road racing and rally Preludes I know of are/were 2WS cars. I'm it A '92 Car and Driver te
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00577.html (9,408 bytes)

219. Re: Prelude 4WS (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 16:57:31 -0500
What year was this? The system you're describing sounds more like the one on the 3d generation ('88-91) cars. The later system was electronically controlled, both to reduce reaction time and to smoot
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00610.html (8,794 bytes)

220. Re: Help me Obi-Wan, I have a Civic! (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 12:27:56 -0500
Will this potentially change *if* the new Street Prepared classing proposal goes through? I don't remember offhand where the newer Civics fall, but it seemed to me that some of the heavier CSP cars h
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00727.html (10,045 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
This search system is powered by Namazu