Mail Archive Search: <+from:golden1@britsys.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:golden1@britsys.net: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 00:11:26 -0500; Mark has made the same point I was trying to put across a couple days ago. Why disqualify someone simply for not having a specific document (the FSM) that likely doesn't include the information need; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00156.html (10,810 bytes)
62. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:07:40 -0500; I think the real solution is a searchable online database where anyone and everyone can contribute specs from any and all sources. That way even if a spec on an obscure car isn't "perfect" it still i; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00180.html (11,539 bytes)
63. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:44:00 -0500; That's exactly the beauty of an online database, it can be self building. The info can be aquired from many sources, but put into the database primarily by the competitors themselves, without involvi; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00188.html (12,488 bytes)
64. Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:42:39 -0500; Exactly what is it you don't understand? You're proving my point! If we took his measurement, right or wrong as compared to what came off the assembly line, as the accepted one in the database, that; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00192.html (9,511 bytes)
65. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:57:40 -0500; I never said it should come from THAT competitor. Even if it did tho, as a public document available to everyone, one of two things would happen: one, several other competitors would challenge the sp; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00193.html (9,508 bytes)
66. Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 12:27:58 -0500; If a more verifiably measurement was submitted by one or more people the conscensis would quickly replace the obviously erronious one since that one could not be confirmed from a second independent s; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00195.html (11,696 bytes)
67. Re: So much for leaving the car unlocked at NATZ (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:03:01 -0500; yep, our friends had their full size ATV "pit buggy" stolen out of the back of their pickup in their hotel parking lot two years ago. -- Original Message -- From: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00198.html (7,369 bytes)
68. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:41:09 -0500; Yes it would be massive at first, but do-able, especially if a list of the most critical specs needed were compiled as minimum starting point to be built on. A source reference should be included wit; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00203.html (10,732 bytes)
69. Re: Subject: Re: shop manuals (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:57:22 -0500; I really don't see an illegal/incorrect spec standing for long, or causing undo expense to match. First, I'm not likely to pull my known stock engine apart to check the deck height for example, but i; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00204.html (11,890 bytes)
70. A new spoon in the FSM pot (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:12:16 -0500; I like to propose a new rule to be implemented as soon as possible: [proposal] For those classes where possessing the FSM is required, it must be presented with the car and available for all competit; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00205.html (8,125 bytes)
71. Re: A new spoon in the FSM pot (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:17:24 -0500; ???? Did you read the proposal before replying? The current rules already require all stock based class cars to have available the FSM in case of protest. All this rule does is make them available fo; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00208.html (10,184 bytes)
72. Re: A new spoon in the FSM pot (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:47:23 -0500; Are you saying they are illegal? 8^O If they don't have the FSM with them, they would be DSQd if protested for anything. ;^) Still gotta have it according to the rules, I didn't make the rules... Wel; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00210.html (9,755 bytes)
73. Yet another national event schedule change (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:05:31 -0500; The DC tour has been changed to Memorial day weekend, and the DC Pro will be the FOLLOWING weekend. The good news is the tour will be on lot A the same huge lot as last year. White out your calander; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00234.html (6,540 bytes)
74. DC events update update (again) (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:20:53 -0500; More info From B. Garfield via SCCAforum: yesterday's post in entiretyWell, it's no shocker to the locals, but we've lost the dates from Fed Ex again so the dates are changing... BUT, there is some g; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00235.html (7,072 bytes)
75. registration and entry lists (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:13:37 -0500; Can anyone else access the online registration link? If Steve is on here, when might it be back up?; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00242.html (6,219 bytes)
76. Re: status of myautoevents.com? (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:03:21 -0500; The status has been changing practically hourly, so keep checking back. been like that since about Friday. -- Original Message -- From: Mike King <mapcomaps@comcast.net> To: Team.Net <autox@autox.tea; /html/autox/2004-03/msg00258.html (6,870 bytes)
77. Re: myautoevents.com?-how to cancel entry (score: 1): Author: "Charles" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:37:45 -0500; You can't cancel online. You need to contact Nancy Downing at headquarters and she will move your entry to the cancelled group.; /html/autox/2004-02/msg00073.html (6,558 bytes)
78. Re: [evolution-disc.] STS2 and SMU at National events (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:16:08 -0500; There are two other new stickers required, a new replacement series one for each side of the car free at tech, and a new front SCCA with a wheel that replaces last year's SCCA one that costs another; /html/autox/2004-02/msg00118.html (8,396 bytes)
79. Re: STS2 and SMU at National events (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:17:04 -0500; Dang, I totally missed the adding of these classes for Atlanta. I could have come in first in a class there!!!! There seems to be a rash of "secret" rules being written. I was announced after the eve; /html/autox/2004-02/msg00119.html (10,316 bytes)
80. Re: [evolution-disc.] STS2 and SMU at National events (score: 1): Author: "Chuck" <golden1@britsys.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:16:30 -0500; My guess it's an attempt to equalize tires for the two driver cars, but as I just posted the 4 runs in a row format gives second drivers far more significant advantages they didn't have before than t; /html/autox/2004-02/msg00122.html (9,130 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]