Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vintage\s+Race\s+Dilemmas\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Vintage\s+Race\s+Dilemmas\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: "HENRY BAHN OF RESD" <hbahn@SMOKE.ESUSDA.GOV>; Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 13:44:26 +500; Don't be in too much of a hurry to define (in advance) what will become the vintage cars of the future. When I started screwing around w/sports cars in the early '60s, Bug Eye Sprites were pretty low; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00100.html (8,025 bytes)
2. Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: PaceCars@aol.com; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:44:44 -0400; I don't go for the rolling eligibility date because it leads to the same problem the SCCA always had - the Car of the Year. As the newer cars become eligible, you have to deal with the fact that the; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00112.html (7,536 bytes)
3. Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hill" <jrhill1@facstaff.wisc.edu>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 01:45:56 +0000; This is getting interesting, and more than a little esoteric. If we're trying to recreate the essence of racing in the "good old days", is it worth remembering that part of that history was the devel; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00113.html (9,021 bytes)
4. Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: dlaver@morgan.com (David Laver); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 10:19:57 +0100; There is a world of differance between cheap racing and historic/vintage racing. Reading this thread I become more and more grateful for the situation in the UK. The VSCC has been discussed already.; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00115.html (8,505 bytes)
5. Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: jeh@world.std.com (jim hayes); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 10:16:15 -0400; That's assuming that the goal is racing. FOr some groups that is the goal, for others, it's having fun while exercising old cars. Both have their place (which is why I now have two cars.) Clip We ha; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00120.html (11,035 bytes)
6. Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: Mike & Jaye Rosen <mra@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 13:16:30 +0000; Jim has hit the nail on the head when he wrote: 1) It must be safe and 2) It must conform to the rulebook of its era. Cars not meeting these rules would be excluded for safety reasons or forced run w; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00123.html (8,640 bytes)
7. Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: Mike & Jaye Rosen <mra@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 11:56:53 +0000; Just a couple of points; a) VARAC selected its two date cut-offs, Dec. 31, 1961 for Vintage and Dec. 31, '72 for historic due to changes that came after each date i.e. MGA getting replaced by MGB, 35; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00142.html (7,704 bytes)
8. Re: Vintage Race Dilemmas... (score: 1): Author: JISBELLJR@mail.utexas.edu (Jim Isbell); Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 13:36:00 -0500; 31, '72 for by MGB, That's why winning so not very drums being racers here to Yes, this makes sense except that it presupposes there is not another classafter 1972. It supposes that all cars worth s; /html/vintage-race/1996-10/msg00145.html (9,044 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]