Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hype\s+R\s+kickin\s+Class\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hype\s+R\s+kickin\s+Class\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: Heyward K Wagner <sportscar48@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:27:38 EST; You are in DS now and you want the Type R moved in? Did you miss the comparison to the M3? Before we try to prove that a Neon is a better race car that a Type R maybe we should try to get a Neon to g; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00646.html (7,667 bytes)
2. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:24:54 -0600; == Nope, didn't miss a thing. IMHO the Type R is a perfect match for the criteria of a DS car. And I'd welcome the "new blood" to the class. BTW, I've been feverishly looking for a used BMW 318ti ha; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00652.html (10,762 bytes)
3. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: Heyward K Wagner <sportscar48@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:46:26 EST; on says.... == Irrelevant points on the race track (and autocross course for the Neons) as the Neon as well as the Type Rs have both proven themselves to be capable of winning. I believe it to not b; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00662.html (8,457 bytes)
4. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:14:39 -0600; == race hours I'd venture to guess that the Neons will be around the racing scene for quite a while. From everything I've heard about their design from Chrysler engineers they are built plenty stout; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00666.html (9,905 bytes)
5. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:20:21 -0600; Naw. The Pinto's true calling is to donate parts to kit cars. Most of what's wrong with the Pinto is due to its body. The rust. The lousy mass distribution. The poor interior space for its size. A cl; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00676.html (8,057 bytes)
6. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: "richard nichols" <rnichol1@san.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:02:08 -0800; Be nice, mine's an original-owner, rust-free car and 27 years old -- driven daily on a 20-year old rebuild and optioned for an auto museum. Won its class last autocross it was in, as I recall. Richar; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00679.html (8,944 bytes)
7. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 18:46:39 -0600; The key words here are: and The Pintos in the Twin Cities rusted out two decades ago... Seriously, enjoy your Pinto. I have no desire to denigrate any particular marque. The facts are that Pintos her; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00680.html (8,027 bytes)
8. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: Heyward K Wagner <sportscar48@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:49:55 EST; I believe there will be many Neon SSB and SSC racers who will celebrate day that their cars finally become eligible for IT racing classes since the SCCA allowed (for other marques at least) trunk kit; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00688.html (8,517 bytes)
9. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:33:35 -0500; Or maybe because the 505 was a Turbo and SCCA hates Turbos... Or maybe because the streets are clogged with GTIs and not many 505's sold... There are many reasons, reliability is just one of them. pZ; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00709.html (8,036 bytes)
10. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:55:01 -0600; == Sorry folks for not snipping away parts of this thread but it's all relevant to the topic. Heyward, I'm guessing that basically we agree on the "trunk kit" topic and here's my side of the debate.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00721.html (10,716 bytes)
11. Re: Hype R kickin Class (score: 1): Author: Jeff Blankenship <jblanken@itds.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:22:26 CST; I agree with you that the trunk kits were a bad idea. I'd like to see them go away completely and serve as an example of how not to tinker with Stock class prep rules. But I also have to disagree tha; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00729.html (10,638 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]