Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Course\s+Safety\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: "James Rogerson" <jwalter@ptra.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 21:24:33 -0600
I have seen three rollovers, one worker hit and two cars on almost one wheel (at '97 Nationals - you could even get a tee-shirt with the picture of one by Thursday), each case save one involved front
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01703.html (7,968 bytes)

2. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 08:02:24 -0800
I can't tell how tongue-in-cheek this is, but I would point out that the car with probably the greatest number of rollovers in Solo II is NOT a fwd car. Should the BMW 318 be outlawed as well? Yep. A
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01710.html (7,446 bytes)

3. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 08:57:19 -0600
place for == Umm, trying to turn ANY car while being "full on the binders" can be unsafe. Most problems are caused by driver error. But then of course we all knew that already. And quit picking on u
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01715.html (8,107 bytes)

4. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 10:09:17 -0500
for I guess we'll have to save them for ice racing (right, Jeff?) In my stock FWD econobox I repeatedly chased and caught a much better driver in a much better prepared BMW 2002tii on the practice c
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01716.html (7,495 bytes)

5. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: RacerRay52@aol.com
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 10:31:09 EST
<< Front wheel drive cars are unsafe under hard braking while attempting to negotiate a sharp turn, especially on "sticky" tires. There is no place for them in Autocross. NOW THAT'S AN EXTREME VIEW.
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01723.html (8,073 bytes)

6. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:51:56 -0600
decreasing interval accompanying weight front driver to Well, none of the above requires that the front wheels be driven. In a decreasing slalom, any car will tend to load the front tires more heavil
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01743.html (8,226 bytes)

7. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:06:41 -0600
POWER driver, that Nope. The engine braking effect will increase front tire loading (and therefore grip), REGARDLESS of which wheels are transmitting the engine braking. Do the statics. The result i
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01748.html (8,740 bytes)

8. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 15:00:16 -0600
Joe rejoinders: rears. Been there, done that. You're thinking of motorcylcles when you think "brakie." Certainly no engine braking condition - and probably no braking condition of any sort - will res
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01751.html (7,785 bytes)

9. Re: Course Safety? (score: 1)
Author: Heyward K Wagner <sportscar48@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:51:19 EST
Sorry it took me so long to write you back, I guess it just took a while to pry my chin off of the floor... I hope your tounge is permently afixed to your cheek, in fear that it is not I will ask you
/html/autox/1999-03/msg01933.html (7,816 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu