Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+Different\s+D\/E\s+Mod\s+Approach\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+Different\s+D\/E\s+Mod\s+Approach\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 06:26:32 -0600; following: You mentioned your excitement about "increased > participation." Raise the minimum weights up to what I mentioned > and you will see massive "increased participation." People with > cheape; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00288.html (11,821 bytes)
2. Re:A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: Jay Scholz <spitford@sisna.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 17:48:13 -0800; third sedan mod class with more realistic weights - - - I have a feeling it could become a VERY heavily subscribed class. For the under 2.0 liter cars, have a 1500/1600 lb limit, over 2.0 and under 3; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00401.html (8,449 bytes)
3. Re: A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 07:11:48 -0600; Finally, some people that read a message for it's content and meaning. My original message: feeling Thanx for your support G; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00424.html (9,384 bytes)
4. re: A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 06:02:44 -0600; in response to my: Read my lips. I already have a built 2.3, and really do not prefer to throw another 10 grand at the car to completely tube it, and install a V8. This isn't an "I" class I propose,; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00555.html (8,629 bytes)
5. Re: A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 11:20:27 -0800; George, I read the whole message. I'm even quoting the whole thing so that no one thinks I've done any editing. This is the *classic* "I Class" argument! Basically, the classic argument goes somethin; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00592.html (8,907 bytes)
6. Re: A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: Gemery@aol.com; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 20:43:24 EST; George Ryan - I understand you have a 2.3 liter quad4 in a legal AP Fiero, despite 4-cyl Fieros coming with 2.5 liters, due to it being legal in roadracing's GT class, correct? You complained that a; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00629.html (11,346 bytes)
7. Re: A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 05:18:54 -0600; In response to your acid dripping statements: I expect the Q4 to be competitive against up to 3.0 liter anything, certainly against the 2.5L in any state of build or tune. I ask you, the expert - -; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00648.html (13,754 bytes)
8. Re: A Different D/E Mod Approach (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:00:48 -0700; George, unless I'm mistaken, the new STU class that is proposed for the National Tours is something right along those lines. If it's legally registered, and running on DOT tires, it's legal. -Josh2 -; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00670.html (8,009 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]