Mail Archive Search: <+from:jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jeff.mohler@wilcom.com: 111 ]

Total 111 documents matching your query.

61. RE: Oil change before or after Autox? (newbie) (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 19:49:55 -0600; -- Err..before the drugs set in I meant to say.. Old oil will have a LOWER internal flow rate..IE: A higher fluid resistance to flow. Ive always felt an appreciable difference in power output after; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00382.html (8,418 bytes)
62. RE: Oil change before or after Autox? (newbie) (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 20:06:08 -0600; -- -- On all the Turbo Supra rebuilds I do (four this month) I do mineral oil only changes at: -20 minutes at 2K rpm -250 miles -500 miles -2500 miles The we allow synthetics (good ones, not found a; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00385.html (8,864 bytes)
63. RE: Oil change before or after Autox? (newbie) (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 20:27:00 -0600; -- Yes, I know. :^) < --Smiley of good-natured oil bashing.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00391.html (8,337 bytes)
64. RE: Oil change before or after Autox? (newbie) (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 19:42:32 -0700; -- Yeah. When I lived in Houston I had access to ugly amounts of free dyno time. I found in my own car an average (three baseline runs, three post change runs) about 3Hp in my 87 Supra Turbo, at a b; /html/autox/1999-03/msg00395.html (8,896 bytes)
65. RE: New car classifications -- I'M done. (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:00:30 -0600; -- Mine is broke, it costs $110, it doesnt get used here anyway. I bypassed it.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01009.html (7,475 bytes)
66. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 08:57:36 -0600; -- Of course it is, the N/A crowd hates turbos. Such a shame we get more benefit from it, when the N/A crowd enjoys the lack of turbolag. Anyone wanna bet that the published HP numbers for turbo car; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01093.html (10,960 bytes)
67. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 14:49:05 -0600; -- Then re-classing the cars is what needs done, not forcing ONE very specific type of design to bolt on yet -another- limiter because it's a better design. Not my fault a well prepared ESP F-Body c; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01131.html (9,405 bytes)
68. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 08:52:07 -0600; -- Thats funny, all three of my sports cars pass with colors on the dyno "full environment" test w/o convertors. One is even wearing moderately heavy modifications.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01173.html (9,367 bytes)
69. RE: Loaded Emissions Tests (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:13:59 -0600; -- Certain counties in Texas almost did, till the state threw it all out (After they contracted someone to build all the stations). Those are what I tested on..neat units. My 78 F150 Ranger however,; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01177.html (7,315 bytes)
70. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:07:32 -0700; -- A well maintained, tuned, and well designed motor, will run very very clean. The Toyota 3S, and 7M designs are extremely clean. My NOX numbers were higher than normal, but within spec. With a cat; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01182.html (10,362 bytes)
71. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 10:26:23 -0700; -- Well, then the EPA needs to get busy then. If I pass in my state, and dozens/hundreds of others do as well under their local sniffer regulations on all sorts of testing procedures..*shrug*; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01194.html (9,525 bytes)
72. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:21:27 -0600; -- This would probably be most "fair" as you would be able to run your full flow potential. You are limited by the turbo physics when it comes down to it. Protesting: If the turbo has the stock casi; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01277.html (9,656 bytes)
73. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:18:22 -0700; -- I can guarantee an ESP legal Supra, will NOT DO 400Hp at the wheels. Most of these cars without boost control will lay down 290-320Hp...thats it. I have seen the extremely rare MK4 on a dyno, tha; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01288.html (9,632 bytes)
74. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 10:19:55 -0600; -- I had the turbos on our Stealth TT upgraded with a more agressive compressor wheel without machine work. I was able then to peg 20psi constantly instead of maybe banging on it once on a cold morn; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01289.html (9,771 bytes)
75. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 10:55:20 -0600; -- But once you get it in a straight line..instant-on torque. You dont get that in a turbo car at 8.x:1 compression and tons of lag. Parity. You cant turn, I cant instantly GO.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01297.html (9,510 bytes)
76. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:44:25 -0600; Upgraded compressor bypass valves (BOVs) were outlawed last year. WHY..nobody can tell me. (Another magic Turbo trick I guess) Correct?; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01302.html (8,885 bytes)
77. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:47:34 -0600; -- Of course, Ive found most Mk4s to be about 16% loss thru the drivetrain on OEM fluids.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01304.html (9,242 bytes)
78. RE: SP rules and ESP Clarification (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:59:18 -0600; -- Suprising to hear the owner claim those numbers, because its not possible without boost control. 100Hp on a MK4 would require at least an additional 7-8psi of boost.; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01310.html (8,069 bytes)
79. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:02:19 -0700; -- True, but if a vehicle has a BOV thats in adequate, then an upgrade should be allowed. The fact is, that there is no non-turbo equal to KILL response like a badly designed (or lack of) BOV. A BOV; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01312.html (10,136 bytes)
80. RE: SP rules on catalytic converters (score: 1): Author: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler@wilcom.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:58:50 -0600; -- I agree. I drive a Mk3 Supra, 220Hp stock max, maybe 235-240 with allowable MODs on a nice COLD day. Stock FS, then ESP. So, the MK4 is basically a huge big-fix for the MK3 supra, HUGE performanc; /html/autox/1999-03/msg01317.html (9,442 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]