triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why do TR's sell for so little money?

To: twakeman@razzolink.com, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Why do TR's sell for so little money?
From: BearTranserv@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:45:00 EDT
In a message dated 8/25/2005 9:59:18 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,  
twakeman@razzolink.com writes:

>>  I prefer these cars remain affordable and accessible to enthusiasts  
>> and drivers... not just museum pieces and investments for  connoisseurs.
> 
> I agree.  I'm a buyer, not a seller.  ;)

I agree as well, especially since I'm a driver. But I do wish I  could 
afford to be a driver of a DB3R or XK120C as well.  It would be  nice if 
the other British cars were affordable as  well.






I think Terri Ann may have hit on at least part of the problem.   Jaguars are 
still made and marketed as expensive, desirable cars.  Everyone  knows them 
and sees the older models as valuable, desirable cars.  Same for  the Aston 
Martin, which Bond still occasionally drives.
 
The popularity of Minis are due in part to the current marketing.   I'll 
wager many new owners never even considered an original Mini, or knew they  
existed.
 
In the US at least, no Triumphs or MGs have been marketed in what, 25  years? 
 So most of the 30 and older crowd don't even know what they are,  much less 
see them as desirable.  TRs might as well be Renaults or Peugeots  to most 
people. Pity us poor Morris and Spridget owners.  We can easily put  two or 
three 
time the market value of the car into a restoration.
 
I like the low prices, but in about 15 years, when I have a few more in the  
stable, I'd love to see the prices go through the roof!
 
 
Robert B.  Houston
Texan in New Mexico

63 TR4
73 MG Midget
94 F150
03  Beetle



To model our political system upon speculations of  lasting tranquility, is 
to calculate on the weaker springs of the human  character.
---Alexander  Hamilton 




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>