triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: SQUAT

To: "'Arthur H. Smith'" <arthurhsmith@compuserve.com>, triumphs <triumphs@autox.team.net>, SPITFIRES <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: SQUAT
From: "Musson, Carl" <musson@satie.arts.usf.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:03:35 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"
I always wondered why when we were in dad's little 14' fishing boat and we
came back into the dock area, when the throttle was pulled back it felt like
you were rising.  Now I know...  I didn't know "squat" either...  I sure
hope things will change now that I know all about squat...  8^)

Actually, it is interesting....

Carl


-----Original Message-----
From:   Arthur H. Smith [mailto:arthurhsmith@compuserve.com]
Sent:   Friday, June 18, 1999 1:52 PM
To:     triumphs; SPITFIRES
Subject:        SQUAT



Last night I watched a program about the investigation into when the QE ll
ran aground off Marthas Vineyard. The Captain and pilot both followed proper
procedure and the only thing left was the charts showing the depth at 39
feet. The QE ll has a draft of 32 feet so there should have been adequate
clearance. At first it was thought the charts could be wrong so NOAA redid
the depth sounding and found a few spots a little less than 39 feet in
depth.
The final finding was, as a ship moves through the water the force of the
water moving under the ship creates a hole around the ship in the water and
the ship actual sinks. While the water level along the water line stays the
same the depression at the water line is closer to the bottom. This
phenomenon is called "squat," so as a ship moves it squats down in the
water. The full extent of the effect was not totally understood so at 25
knots the QE ll sank 8 feet and the 7 feet of clearance disappeared. Hence
it ran aground in water that was 39 feet deep.
It ended with the announcer saying that after 20 years experience the
captain of the QE ll didn't know "squat."

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>