triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: hi to all...

To: "Scott D. Sanders" <ssanders@mail.coin.missouri.edu>
Subject: Re: hi to all...
From: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 10:06:24 -0900 (PDT)
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
On Tue, 14 May 1996, Scott D. Sanders wrote:

> now... i'm on the verge of being involved with my first love again, this
> time a MK IV spit. a girl that i'm seeing (hi delores) has a chance at a
> very straight and clean spit, been in storage, a friend of her
> brother-in-laws, etc. the brother-in-law got it running, but he's a tall
> 300 pounder, and is having second thoughts. he's saying it's a 74, can you
> guys help me out, i haven't perused all my triumph bookmarks yet, isn't MK
> IV 71-72 only? maybe i'd better check the VIN numbers before this gets too
> far.

Quick answer: an FK prefix in Commission number would peg it as a 1971 or
1972. An FM prefix would peg it as a 1973 or later. Get the engine 
number, too; many different motors fit in there, so going by the engine 
number is the only sure way to tell exactly what it has.

> ...i told her for 550 bux, she'd better jump on it, (as long as 
> the drivetrain checks out mostly ok) or else keep me away from it...  

Sounds like a potentially good deal.

Keep us posted.

--Andy, who always thought that the Datsun Roadsters were the most 
nearly "British" of Japanese cars (Z's would be in 2nd place)!

Andrew Mace
10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Consultant
Vintage Triumph Register
amace@unix2.nysed.gov


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>