tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Front suspension

To: "garywinblad@comcast.net" <garywinblad@comcast.net>, "blance598@gmail.com" <blance598@gmail.com>, "tigers@autox.team.net" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Front suspension
From: Michael Wood via Tigers <tigers@autox.team.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: tigers@autox.team.net
References: <CACQC2nWdwBhLzzfu7LT8LisQv--5pgQnWWtgZET1A35Eh4EnaA@mail.gmail.com> <830812442.1004153.1633054404982@connect.xfinity.com> <CACQC2nWqdyxbpsJfZydbYAoqLunsbYiY+zCKRM6=27xY8fn_cQ@mail.gmail.com> <494261672.1023398.1633099282074@connect.xfinity.com> <1408585327.599277.1633103675054@mail.yahoo.com> <1394424770.65617.1633105421591@connect.xfinity.com>
--===============6316598630918505027==
        boundary="----=_Part_604632_1308470821.1633106227480"

------=_Part_604632_1308470821.1633106227480
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm far from expert...maybe a layman open to experimenting lol=C2=A0
I think a lot of guys building Mustangs, Camaros etc still do the Shelby dr=
op (relocating the upper control arm downwards). But, I don't know how it w=
ould work on a Tiger, as we run into control arm clearance to unibody issue=
s pretty quickly at the fastener to the rear (if you follow what I'm saying=
) when shimming for negative camber. That clearance becomes even less when =
you start looking at dropping the physical location of the UCA. So, the que=
stion would be whether the negative camber gained in drop would offset the =
loss of ability to shim, I guess. But, yeah, the camber curve should improv=
e.=C2=A0
Wonder if anyone has done it?
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: GARY WINBLAD <garywinblad@comcast.net>
To: Michael Wood <mwood24020@aol.com>; blance598@gmail.com <blance598@gmail=
.com>; tigers@autox.team.net <tigers@autox.team.net>
Sent: Fri, Oct 1, 2021 9:23 am
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Front suspension

  Mike,   Thanks for your expert analysis!   Yes, I never did find what Ack=
erman is best either..=C2=A0 I heard Doane speak and he said the reverse Ac=
kerman is actually an advantage when you are   countersteering (what I thin=
k he meant).=C2=A0 I wrote a program to figure out how it works on the Tige=
r.=C2=A0 Turns out Ackerman is not really that bad until   you get to prett=
y extreme steering angles, so on a big track it isn't really that bad.=C2=
=A0 And with initial toe-out dialed in it might not be that bad on a really=
   tight course.=C2=A0 And because of the fulcrum pin issue, I NEVER go ful=
l lock anymore, even parking.   Yeah camber... why did the lowered a-arm tr=
ick seem to work back in the day but isn't used anymore?=C2=A0 The GT-350s =
I have looked at still have it.   I know it was bad for braking but so is i=
nitial negative camber?   Heavy steering, why I left my big stock steering =
wheel.   Gary  =20
 =20
  On 10/01/2021 11:54 AM Michael Wood <mwood24020@aol.com> wrote:  =20
  =20
    Gary, I think you nailed it, reverse Ackermann leads to some funky slip=
 angles and strangely heavy steering, particularly felt at low speeds...the=
 front tires are literally fighting each other. The fact we all typically a=
dd wider wheels makes the steering even heavier (both contact patch to move=
 around and scrub radius). Finally, maxing out caster with wedges (which I =
do) makes it even worse!=C2=A0   The longer MG steering arms help, I've fou=
nd on cars I've driven so equipped, but I haven't bothered to do on my car.=
 Toe out changes the slip angle and also helps get the car to turn in, but =
I only go to toe out (1/4") when autocrossing, as toe out also is a great w=
ay to kill tires. Besides the poor camber curve, Ackerman is another reason=
 why I run as much negative camber as possible...if the outside wheel isn't=
 technically aligned to the turn radius correctly, at least I can maximize =
the unaligned contact patch in roll lol. Funny thing, even the real experts=
 I've read can't seem to agree on "Ackermann", because there are so many ot=
her variables.   I don't know, outside of a custom solution like Dale's or =
Hokanson's front ends, of a real fix. I've just learned to live with heavy =
steering, but if it really is a problem, going to stock width wheels and sm=
aller section width tires really makes a difference. The electric power ste=
ering solution has gotten to be a pretty easy=C2=A0deal, but that obviously=
 does nothing to address the underlying geometry issues.   Mike=20
=20
=20
-----Original Message-----=20
From: GARY WINBLAD <garywinblad@comcast.net>=20
To: Lance Beauchamp <blance598@gmail.com>; Tiger List <tigers@autox.team.ne=
t>=20
Sent: Fri, Oct 1, 2021 7:42 am=20
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Front suspension=20
=20
     Lance,   =C2=A0There are a couple more expensive solutions that might =
be still available.   Dale did design and make an entire front crossmember/=
suspension.=C2=A0 It fixed the geometry but was about $5K   last I heard, a=
nd he might have stopped making them.   People (mostly in EU) have put in e=
lectric power steering.=C2=A0 It mounts up under the dash so it all looks s=
tock,   would be great in a parking lot or tight course.=C2=A0 Others have =
put in conventional hydraulic power steering.   Shelby had his guys put in =
a Miata power rack in his wife's Tiger for instance.   Gary  =20
 =20
  On 10/01/2021 9:36 AM Lance Beauchamp <blance598@gmail.com> wrote:  =20
  =20
   So it is what it is, end of story, thank very much for a really good exp=
lanation,=C2=A0 still love the car. Beau=C2=A0 =20
   On Thu, Sep 30, 2021, 10:13 PM GARY WINBLAD <garywinblad@comcast.net> wr=
ote:=20
 =20
    HI Lance,   Steering geometry is a real problem.=C2=A0 Shelby throwing =
the rack way out in front of the engine was a quick solution.   Rootes didn=
't want to change a Shelby design... so we suffer today.=C2=A0 Doane knew i=
t was a problem but he thought   Rootes would build a new crossmember.   Th=
e problem is when you go around a corner, the inside wheel needs to run a s=
maller radius turn than the outside.   Toe in on turns or Ackerman geometry=
 is what it is called.=C2=A0 =C2=A0The Tiger has reverse Ackerman, the inne=
r wheel turns   a larger radius!=C2=A0 When I used to push my Tiger out to =
my slightly downhill driveway it was easier to turn the wheel   full lock t=
han to reach down and pull the parking brake... what a great design Shelby!=
   On a tight autocross course or a parking lot this is really less than id=
eal...=C2=A0 MIKE analysis??   On a big course it might not make such a dif=
ference though Jim Adams said he had to "toss the Tiger like a sprint   car=
"=C2=A0 (keeping it jumping and sliding rather than be smooth.. I hear that=
 as...).  =20
   Longer MGB steering arms and initial toe-out is the small solution Dale =
has...   You may notice, its hard to turn the wheel at slow speeds, especia=
lly with big sticky tires.   But once you go into a fairly tight turn, it b=
ecomes easier as both tires lose contact.. and the Tiger goes straight   of=
f the corner...  =20
   Mike, do I have it anywhere correct?   Gary W.  =20
 =20
  On 09/30/2021 9:55 PM Lance Beauchamp <blance598@gmail.com> wrote:  =20
  =20
   You say you spend alot of time on suspension Gary, can you tell me how t=
o make the Tiger easier to turn at lower speeds, like 15 mph or under. I al=
ways=C2=A0 blame the steering=C2=A0 geometry,=C2=A0 is it all that?=C2=A0 B=
eau=C2=A0 =20
 =20
 =20
  _______________________________________________=20
=20
tigers@autox.team.net=20
=20
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive=
=20
=20
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mwood24020@aol.co=
m=20
=20
=20
 =20
=20
------=_Part_604632_1308470821.1633106227480
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div style=3D"font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:b=
lack;"><div style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10=
pt; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-seri=
f; font-size: 10pt; color: black;">I'm far from expert...maybe a layman ope=
n to experimenting lol&nbsp;</div><div style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetic=
a,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family=
: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black;"><br></div><di=
v style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color:=
 black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-si=
ze: 10pt; color: black;">I think a lot of guys building Mustangs, Camaros e=
tc still do the Shelby drop (relocating the upper control arm downwards). B=
ut, I don't know how it would work on a Tiger, as we run into control arm c=
learance to unibody issues pretty quickly at the fastener to the rear (if y=
ou follow what I'm saying) when shimming for negative camber. That clearanc=
e becomes even less when you start looking at dropping the physical locatio=
n of the UCA. So, the question would be whether the negative camber gained =
in drop would offset the loss of ability to shim, I guess. But, yeah, the c=
amber curve should improve.&nbsp;</div><div style=3D"font-family: arial,hel=
vetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-f=
amily: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black;"><br></di=
v><div style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; c=
olor: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; fo=
nt-size: 10pt; color: black;">Wonder if anyone has done it?</div><div style=
=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black;=
" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10p=
t; color: black;"><br></div><div style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans=
-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: aria=
l,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black;">Mike</div><div styl=
e=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: black=
;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10=
pt; color: black;"><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: GARY WINBLAD=
 &lt;garywinblad@comcast.net&gt;<br>To: Michael Wood &lt;mwood24020@aol.com=
&gt;; blance598@gmail.com &lt;blance598@gmail.com&gt;; tigers@autox.team.ne=
t &lt;tigers@autox.team.net&gt;<br>Sent: Fri, Oct 1, 2021 9:23 am<br>Subjec=
t: Re: [Tigers] Front suspension<br><br></div><div id=3D"yiv1610308570"><di=
v>
  <div>
   Mike,
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   Thanks for your expert analysis!
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   Yes, I never did find what Ackerman is best either..&nbsp; I heard Doane=
 speak and he said the reverse Ackerman is actually an advantage when you a=
re
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   countersteering (what I think he meant).&nbsp; I wrote a program to figu=
re out how it works on the Tiger.&nbsp; Turns out Ackerman is not really th=
at bad until
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   you get to pretty extreme steering angles, so on a big track it isn't re=
ally that bad.&nbsp; And with initial toe-out dialed in it might not be tha=
t bad on a really
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   tight course.&nbsp; And because of the fulcrum pin issue, I NEVER go ful=
l lock anymore, even parking.
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   Yeah camber... why did the lowered a-arm trick seem to work back in the =
day but isn't used anymore?&nbsp; The GT-350s I have looked at still have i=
t.
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   I know it was bad for braking but so is initial negative camber?
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   Heavy steering, why I left my big stock steering wheel.
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   Gary
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
   <br clear=3D"none">
  </div>
  <div class=3D"yiv1610308570yqt4128808675" id=3D"yiv1610308570yqt43507"><b=
lockquote type=3D"cite">
   <div>
    On 10/01/2021 11:54 AM Michael Wood &lt;mwood24020@aol.com&gt; wrote:
   </div>
   <div>
    <br clear=3D"none">
   </div>
   <div>
    <br clear=3D"none">
   </div>
   <div style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif=
; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, hel=
vetica, sans-serif; color: black;">
    <div style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10p=
t; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-ser=
if; font-size: 10pt; color: black;">
     Gary, I think you nailed it, reverse Ackermann leads to some funky sli=
p angles and strangely heavy steering, particularly felt at low speeds...th=
e front tires are literally fighting each other. The fact we all typically =
add wider wheels makes the steering even heavier (both contact patch to mov=
e around and scrub radius). Finally, maxing out caster with wedges (which I=
 do) makes it even worse!&nbsp;
    </div>
    <div style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10p=
t; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-ser=
if; font-size: 10pt; color: black;">
     The longer MG steering arms help, I've found on cars I've driven so eq=
uipped, but I haven't bothered to do on my car. Toe out changes the slip an=
gle and also helps get the car to turn in, but I only go to toe out (1/4") =
when autocrossing, as toe out also is a great way to kill tires. Besides th=
e poor camber curve, Ackerman is another reason why I run as much negative =
camber as possible...if the outside wheel isn't technically aligned to the =
turn radius correctly, at least I can maximize the unaligned contact patch =
in roll lol. Funny thing, even the real experts I've read can't seem to agr=
ee on "Ackermann", because there are so many other variables.
    </div>
    <div style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10p=
t; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-ser=
if; font-size: 10pt; color: black;">
     I don't know, outside of a custom solution like Dale's or Hokanson's f=
ront ends, of a real fix. I've just learned to live with heavy steering, bu=
t if it really is a problem, going to stock width wheels and smaller sectio=
n width tires really makes a difference. The electric power steering soluti=
on has gotten to be a pretty easy&nbsp;deal, but that obviously does nothin=
g to address the underlying geometry issues.
    </div>
    <div style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10p=
t; color: black;" data-mce-style=3D"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-ser=
if; font-size: 10pt; color: black;">
     Mike
     <br clear=3D"none">
     <br clear=3D"none">
     <br clear=3D"none">-----Original Message-----
     <br clear=3D"none">From: GARY WINBLAD &lt;garywinblad@comcast.net&gt;
     <br clear=3D"none">To: Lance Beauchamp &lt;blance598@gmail.com&gt;; Ti=
ger List &lt;tigers@autox.team.net&gt;
     <br clear=3D"none">Sent: Fri, Oct 1, 2021 7:42 am
     <br clear=3D"none">Subject: Re: [Tigers] Front suspension
     <br clear=3D"none">
     <br clear=3D"none">
    </div>
    <div id=3D"yiv1610308570">
     <div>
      <div>
       Lance,
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       &nbsp;There are a couple more expensive solutions that might be stil=
l available.
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       Dale did design and make an entire front crossmember/suspension.&nbs=
p; It fixed the geometry but was about $5K
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       last I heard, and he might have stopped making them.
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       People (mostly in EU) have put in electric power steering.&nbsp; It =
mounts up under the dash so it all looks stock,
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       would be great in a parking lot or tight course.&nbsp; Others have p=
ut in conventional hydraulic power steering.
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       Shelby had his guys put in a Miata power rack in his wife's Tiger fo=
r instance.
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       Gary
      </div>
      <div class=3D"yiv1610308570default-style">
       <br clear=3D"none">
      </div>
      <blockquote type=3D"cite">
       <div>
        On 10/01/2021 9:36 AM Lance Beauchamp &lt;blance598@gmail.com&gt; w=
rote:
       </div>
       <div>
        <br clear=3D"none">
       </div>
       <div>
        <br clear=3D"none">
       </div>
       <div>
        So it is what it is, end of story, thank very much for a really goo=
d explanation,&nbsp; still love the car. Beau&nbsp;
       </div>
       <br clear=3D"none">
       <div class=3D"yiv1610308570gmail_quote">
        <div class=3D"yiv1610308570gmail_attr" dir=3D"ltr">
         On Thu, Sep 30, 2021, 10:13 PM GARY WINBLAD &lt;<a rel=3D"nofollow=
 noopener noreferrer" shape=3D"rect" ymailto=3D"mailto:garywinblad@comcast.=
net" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:garywinblad@comcast.net";>garywinblad@=
comcast.net</a>&gt; wrote:=20
         <br clear=3D"none">
        </div>
        <blockquote>
         <u></u>
         <div>
          <div>
           HI Lance,
          </div>
          <div>
           Steering geometry is a real problem.&nbsp; Shelby throwing the r=
ack way out in front of the engine was a quick solution.
          </div>
          <div>
           Rootes didn't want to change a Shelby design... so we suffer tod=
ay.&nbsp; Doane knew it was a problem but he thought
          </div>
          <div>
           Rootes would build a new crossmember.
          </div>
          <div>
           The problem is when you go around a corner, the inside wheel nee=
ds to run a smaller radius turn than the outside.
          </div>
          <div>
           Toe in on turns or Ackerman geometry is what it is called.&nbsp;=
 &nbsp;The Tiger has reverse Ackerman, the inner wheel turns
          </div>
          <div>
           a larger radius!&nbsp; When I used to push my Tiger out to my sl=
ightly downhill driveway it was easier to turn the wheel
          </div>
          <div>
           full lock than to reach down and pull the parking brake... what =
a great design Shelby!
          </div>
          <div>
           On a tight autocross course or a parking lot this is really less=
 than ideal...&nbsp; MIKE analysis??
          </div>
          <div>
           On a big course it might not make such a difference though Jim A=
dams said he had to "toss the Tiger like a sprint
          </div>
          <div>
           car"&nbsp; (keeping it jumping and sliding rather than be smooth=
.. I hear that as...).
          </div>
          <div>
           <br clear=3D"none">
          </div>
          <div>
           Longer MGB steering arms and initial toe-out is the small soluti=
on Dale has...
          </div>
          <div>
           You may notice, its hard to turn the wheel at slow speeds, espec=
ially with big sticky tires.
          </div>
          <div>
           But once you go into a fairly tight turn, it becomes easier as b=
oth tires lose contact.. and the Tiger goes straight
          </div>
          <div>
           off the corner...
          </div>
          <div>
           <br clear=3D"none">
          </div>
          <div>
           Mike, do I have it anywhere correct?
          </div>
          <div>
           Gary W.
          </div>
          <div>
           <br clear=3D"none">
          </div>
          <blockquote type=3D"cite">
           <div>
            On 09/30/2021 9:55 PM Lance Beauchamp &lt;<a rel=3D"nofollow no=
opener noreferrer" shape=3D"rect" ymailto=3D"mailto:blance598@gmail.com"; ta=
rget=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:blance598@gmail.com";>blance598@gmail.com</a>=
&gt; wrote:
           </div>
           <div>
            <br clear=3D"none">
           </div>
           <div>
            <br clear=3D"none">
           </div>
           <div>
            You say you spend alot of time on suspension Gary, can you tell=
 me how to make the Tiger easier to turn at lower speeds, like 15 mph or un=
der. I always&nbsp; blame the steering&nbsp; geometry,&nbsp; is it all that=
?&nbsp; Beau&nbsp;
           </div>
          </blockquote>
         </div>
        </blockquote>
       </div>
      </blockquote>
     </div>
    </div>_______________________________________________
    <br clear=3D"none">
    <br clear=3D"none"><a rel=3D"nofollow noopener noreferrer" shape=3D"rec=
t" ymailto=3D"mailto:tigers@autox.team.net"; target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailt=
o:tigers@autox.team.net">tigers@autox.team.net</a>
    <br clear=3D"none">
    <br clear=3D"none">Donate: <a rel=3D"nofollow noopener noreferrer" shap=
e=3D"rect" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://www.team.net/donate.html";>http:=
//www.team.net/donate.html</a>
    <br clear=3D"none">Archive: <a rel=3D"nofollow noopener noreferrer" sha=
pe=3D"rect" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers"=
>http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers </a><a rel=3D"nofollow noopener noref=
errer" shape=3D"rect" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://autox.team.net/archi=
ve">http://autox.team.net/archive</a>
    <br clear=3D"none">
    <br clear=3D"none">Unsubscribe: <a rel=3D"nofollow noopener noreferrer"=
 shape=3D"rect" target=3D"_blank" href=3D"http://autox.team.net/mailman/opt=
ions/tigers/mwood24020@aol.com">http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tiger=
s/mwood24020@aol.com</a>
    <br clear=3D"none">
    <br clear=3D"none">
    <br clear=3D"none">
   </div>
  </blockquote></div>
 </div></div></div>
------=_Part_604632_1308470821.1633106227480--

--===============6316598630918505027==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________

tigers@autox.team.net

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/tigers http://autox.team.net/archive

Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net



--===============6316598630918505027==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>