SOunds to me like this thread is going down hill...I
mean...comparing crank sizes and whose is bigger.
:0)))
Dan
--- Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> I don't understand, your crank is BIGGER that the
> stock spec?
> Is that a typo in your message?
>
> Ulix
>
> on 10/17/00 10:02, Biff Jones at biffjones@erols.com
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > With the current discussions re turning a crank I
> have the
> > following question;
> > I acquired a 1275 crank which shows signs that it
> has been
> > recently worked on.
> > The rod journals mike out at 1.6259 (actually
> 1.626) which
> > according to the manuals the upper end of stock,
> however the
> > mains mike at 2.0015. Stock manual measurements
> state 2.0005 to
> > 2.0010, can I run it as is, being .0005 under with
> stock
> > bearings, or should I have it turned down to 10
> thousands under?
> > I am at the point of having it and the fly wheel
> worked on and
> > need advice. Thanks,
> > Biff Jones
> > Pasadena, MD
> > '59 Bugeye, "Kermit'
> > '62 Sprite, 'Ole Gray'
> > http://sprites2.homestead.com/index.html
> >
> >
>
> Ulix
> __/__,__ ___/__|\__
>
..............................................(_o____o_)....<_O_____O_/...
> http://www.mirafiori.com/~ulix/ '67
> Sprite '74 X1/9
>
>
=====
Dan Dwelley
77 Midget
Alexandria, Va.
__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
|