Max,
I don't disagree with you wrt the lead. The original post had nothing to do
with performance, rather, the running on that is common to the MGA 1622 high
compression engine. The only solution to the problem appears to be to use
what the manufacturer originally spec'd out for the car, which is high
octane fuel. Show me an alternative to solving the run on problem and I
will gladly try it. BTW, I doubt a handful of LBC's spewing lead would
hardly be noticed amongst the airplanes, race cars and other assorted 'off
road' vehicles that are still allowed to spew lead into the atmosphere.
Atmospherically respectful,
Gordie Bird
62 MGA
80 MGB
86 Audi 4kq
> using asbestos in classroom insulation. And there is no performance
> rationale for using 104 octane fuel in a street MG, anyway,
> except for
> ego gratification. I mean, get real -- who is running 12:1
> compression?
>
> Elliott DeGraff had this to say:
>
> >You only need to add 1 gallon of 100LL avgas to a tankful of
> high test
> >unleaded. The excess lead in the avgas will boost the unleaded to an
> >acceptable level.
> >
> >Elliott DeGraff
> >2 71Bs
> >
> >ATWEDITOR@aol.com wrote:
> >>
> >> In a message dated 5/18/00 1:02:13 PM, gb@the-bdc.com writes:
> >>
> >> << One day I hope to find someone who sells real 104 octane racing
> >> fuel. I'll run a tank of that and see what happens. >>
> >>
> >> Here's what some racers used to do, not sure they still do
> this: Go to your
> >> local general aviation airport with a 5-gallon can and
> have them fill it
> with
> >> Avgas. There used to be several higher octanes, but if my
> memory is correct
> >> the common avgas is still 100 octane. Word when I used to
> work at airports
> >> was that they just mixed the avgas with regular gas, as
> running pure would
> >> burn the pistons. YMMV, and this is all hearsay.
> >>
> >> Jay Donoghue
> >> 72B
> >> 72B-GT
> >> 66 Mustang
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Max Heim
> '66 MGB GHN3L76149
> If you're near Mountain View, CA,
> it's the red one with the silver bootlid.
>
|