In a message dated 12/13/2001 3:16:09 PM Pacific Standard Time,
saltrat@pro-blend.com writes:
>
>
> I guess I shouldn't have said anything!
> I did not say that the minimum was wrong (incorrectly established).......I
> said that it is illogical to have a 200 (note the number) club that you
> have to go 270 or more to get into.
>
> Now if I accept the fact that minimums are going to be established, then
> looking a A/GL (was 265 now 274) and saying that 270 is realistic for AA/GL
> is a logical statement.
>
> But if you look at A/FL, the record is 292 and B is 298 so with my logical
> frame of mind I expect about 300 but I look at the minimum for AA/FL and
> find 280!! Should it be 300? or 310????? Could it be made consistent?
>
> So what if it was? Just having the minimum at all, in my view, is
> illogical!
>
> Skip (Don't forget that the car owner/builder (me in this case) does not
>
Skip,
I'm glad you said something, and I appreciate and respect the way you put
it.
I'm sure that some of the minimums set during the last regime of the
200MPH Club could arguably need reconsideration. I've found the present slate
of officers to be pretty reasonable and approachable guys......Doug
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
/// or go to http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///
|