Mayf,
In my opinion a class minimum should not be lower than the class below.
There was a time when 200 mph was a difficult task. Today most "E" class
records are over 200. It just makes sense to me to set minimum at a
reasonable level to make a record mean anything. That is how I view
this, some other my not feel that you should have to excel to be a
record holder. To have slipped easily into the 2 Club would have not
made my day!
Tom
DrMayf wrote:
>Ok, Tom, if the SCTA set the minimums "unreasonably low", how was it decided
>what it (they) should be? And blame? No blame on anything here. This is a
>list for exploring. No one should every get hostile over questions or even
>answers. Just people chatting and being friends.
>
>mayf, who does not care a hoot about the 2 club...only the interesting
>thoughts of the thread
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
>To: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
>Cc: "Skip Higginbotham" <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:03 PM
>Subject: Re: 2 Club
>
>
>>Mayf,
>>
>>This is not really a 200 Club issue. The minimums are there because the
>>SCTA set the minimums unreasonably low.
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
/// or go to http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///
|