| Subject: | [Fot] 89MM piston question |
|---|---|
| From: | tr4racing at googlemail.com (tr4racing at googlemail.com) |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:57:39 +0200 |
| References: | <CAMJWJcHsmkMuWwvt1bs3Lax-kTVTkADpdNrFiWUahJDa2r3zsg@mail.gmail.com> <1659c8fa8c2-1ebc-238b@webjas-vaa013.srv.aolmail.net> <90DC3BE5-84AA-4C92-95A5-CA7831825C2C@ponostyle.com> <2F97DC1C-07AC-48FE-8CED-E6E865D4A7DE@ponostyle.com> <002d01d44350$39bb7c20$ad327460$@gmail.com> <2CA957DD-874F-48A6-95B5-4939DA460A56@ponostyle.com> |
I'm happy to have an engine like a steam puller. Not as fast as Marcels engine, but reliable (mostly) and easy to drive. No need for funny HP numbers. Reliability is king in my opinion. Cheers Chris -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Bill <Bill at ponostyle.com> Gesendet: Montag, 3. September 2018 16:40 An: tr4racing at googlemail.com Cc: fot at autox. team. net <fot at autox.team.net> Betreff: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question That?s impressive. Now is you could just produce that peak torque at 10,000 RPM you?d have a 314HP motor. Or somehow move the torque peak to 6350 RPM you?d have 200. > On Sep 2, 2018, at 11:34 PM, Chris Marx via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> wrote: > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Fot] 89MM piston question, van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Fot] Rolex Reunion practice and qualifying video, DAVE HOGYE |
| Previous by Thread: | [Fot] 89MM piston question, van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be |
| Next by Thread: | [Fot] 89MM piston question, John Styduhar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |