fot
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] 89MM piston question

Subject: [Fot] 89MM piston question
From: gasket.works at gte.net (Mordy Dunst)
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 19:13:05 -0400
References: <CAMJWJcHsmkMuWwvt1bs3Lax-kTVTkADpdNrFiWUahJDa2r3zsg@mail.gmail.com>
Its the torque that counts.  So, I suspect the motor enhancements took the 
benefit of the tractor stroke.  If the motor is  able  to produce  that power 
at 6k rpm with shift at 6500.    
I shift at @ 6200 - my motor produces  max power @5800 on the dyno. I use a 
kastner designed cam for which  I have the masters. 

 

MDunst Headgasket.com 626.358.1616 
Fax 626.628.3777 
Triple R Munitions, Inc 626.201.9471 
T FFL 6,7 SOT 2

On Sunday, September 2, 2018, John Styduhar via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> 
wrote:

What kind of modifications were done to the engine to extract over 200 HP from 
a tractor engine?  Nitrous shot.


On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 3:05 PM Thomas Boyd <tom at trenterprises.com> wrote:
All of our FIA race cars are running legal 87mm engines.
Just rolling roaded the latest SLR build at well north of 200bhp

Thomas Boyd
Director
TR Enterprises
01623 793807 (ext 302)
www.trenterprises.com


On 1 Sep 2018, at 17:02, John Styduhar via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> wrote:

If you really had serious compliance with most group's rules, I would guess 
half the TR cars would not pass muster.  Let's have fun together.   


On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM Terry Stetler via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> 
wrote:
Indeed there are Glen.

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

 
From: Fot <fot-bounces at autox.team.net> on behalf of fubog1 via Fot <fot at 
autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2018 7:34:26 AM
To: rkramer56 at gmail.com
Cc: fot at autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question
 
everybody else seems to be using 89.
HaHa not everybody, rules say 87mm, there are still a few guys running them 
(and winning)...
Glen 



-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kramer via Fot <fot at autox.team.net>
To: van.mulders.marcel <van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be>
Cc: fot <fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Fri, Aug 31, 2018 11:26 pm
Subject: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question

I've always used 87 MM due to the rules but everybody else seems to be using 
89. The procedures are the same so It'll be the same. I blew a head gasket last 
time out, compression into the cooling system and blew off the bottom hose. I 
guess it wasn't tight enough, and scuffed two pistons before I could shut it 
down. 

Bob Kramer

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:43 PM, <van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be> wrote:
Bob,
It is definitely necessary to make that modification to the liners. The relieve 
should correspond to the shape of the combustion chambers : about 4 mm wide on 
a 89mm engine.
Marcel

Van: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net>
Cc: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net>
Verzonden: Donderdag 30 augustus 2018 00:05:43
Onderwerp: [Fot] 89MM piston question

Do the guys running the 89MM pistons and liners need to relieve the liners to 
clear the intake valve, or does the extra MM make the difference?

Bob Kramer

On Tue, 

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot


_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot


_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot


_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180902/d996c8c7/attachment.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>