I understand safety was not part of the original, but it is part of this
one. Safety is not something we should argue for. It should be the most
important factor into making any decision. If three is safer than two, then
three it is. As john mentioned, at one point you are going to have too
many, but IMHO three per station is not too many.
--Navid
>
> the original argument had nothing to do with safety. it was that you
> have three things to hold and need three people to hold them (flagger,
> coner, radioer).
>
> if you want to argue safety id say three is safer than two, but does
> that mean its not safe enough with two? when did that get decided?
>
> id be happy to talk with you about this on sunday. i feel personally
> responsible because i created the three column worker sign up sheet.
>
> james
> OSP - Omniscient Safety Practitioners
|