autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would

To: "Nathaniel J. Leon" <nielleon@hotmail.com>, nersolo@ner.org,
Subject: RE: [evolution-disc.] Re: Potential new helmet rule would
From: Matt Murray <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 13:47:08 -0500
Yes, I know. But, does M-T use the same QC metrics for O-rings as they do 
SRS propellant?  <j/k>  :^)

Matt Murray

At 12:02 PM 11/18/2004, Nathaniel J. Leon wrote:

>>Matt Murray wrote as  PS
>
>>Just remember, Morton-Thiokol supplies the propellant for most
>>SRSs. You remember Morton-Thiokol, they built the booster rockets
>>for the Shuttles.
>
>Matt
>
>-Morton-Thiokol does make the propellent, but the propellent is not what 
>caused the 1987 Challenger Disaster (Fiasco).
>
>It was an O-ring in an improperly design joint seal that was operated 
>outside of its know temperature limits.
>
>Niel Leon






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>