autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Contributing to the SM Inclusion List

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Contributing to the SM Inclusion List
From: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:43:25 -0500
"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com> wrote:
> Matt Murray wrote:

Weights and sizes would be REALLY helpful!

>> IMO, these come under the heading of "rare".

"rare" is not, by itself, a killer tomato. "rare" coupled to "overdog" is;
especially if "expensive" is in the mix too.

>> AMX

> Two seat cars.

One of the nice things about an inclusion list is we can allow in 2-seaters
that don't drive like 2-seaters. There are 4-seaters that act like
2-seaters, why can't the inverse be true?

>> Javelin (all)

> Rare, but I don't think they have any advantage over other period
> ponycars.

Agreed.

>>  Milano

> That's a sedan which came with Alfa's largest engine, a V6. Not
> that much potential for improvement. No threat to SM.

>> America (all)

> Austin Americas have the same chassis and driveline as Minis. Ifn
> Minis are excluded, Americas should be as well.

>> 2002 ti

> Never sold in the US, and it doesn't matter. You can make a 2002
> into a ti with (mostly) SP-legal changes. No advantage in SM.

>> & tii

> Likewise. Everything that distinguishes a tii from a normal 2002
> is unrestricted in SM.

>> (all) Bavaria

> This listing should include BMW 2500/2800/Bavaria/3.0S, all of
> which are quite large (for German cars of the time) five-seat
> sedans. They are not particularly rare, nor are they any threat
> to SM.

For all cars that are "not a threat to SM", it would really help if it were
stated *why* it's not a threat to SM.

>>1800ti

> Again, this listing should include 1600/1800/2000 sedans, along
> with the 1800ti. Four-door sedans, overweight, too tall, and
> underpowered in their original form. They share driveline
> components with '02 BMWs and weigh much more. No threat to SM.

Like this. :) Good job.

>> TISA

> Only 8 (from memory) ever made. Based on the sedans listed above,
> they were built to compete in the Sebring 12 hrs. of 196(5 or 6 I
> believe). I've driven and worked on one of these cars. SM rules
> allow all the mods necessary to convert an 1800 into a TISA. No
> threat to SM.

>>  Corvair & Yenko Stage I & II & III (all)

> Aww, heck. Let the Corvair guys have some fun, woncha?

Howard is *conviced* that there are lots of Corvairs just itching to run
SM. These cars should already be legal....

If one can find a Corvair anywhere that's not already a CP car that is.

>> Arrow /Sapporo

> Dunno.

>> Abarth (all)

> Agreed. Tuner cars. May be possible to make a Fiat 600 into an
> Abarth, but 600s are extremely small and light, too, and should
> probably be excluded.

>>  Cortina

> No more problematic than Pintos. Probably heavier, live rear axle
> w/leaf springs. A Capri would probably be a better choice for an
> SM car anyway.

>> Cobra R

> I'm not positive, but I bet the SM rules allow all the changes
> you need to make a Mustang into a Cobra R.

They do.

>>  Scorpion (all)

> Two seats.

And...?

>> Beta & Zagato ('75-83)

> Basically Fignats. Even rarer, though. I don't think you'll be
> alienating a large contingency if you leave these out.  ;<)

You'd be suprised. Somewhere out there is a Zagato-driving Paul Foster
clone. :(

>> Biturbo

> Big, ugly, unreliable sedan. Rare, but mostly because almost none
> of the remaining ones can be kept running. The biggest threat a
> Biturbo would pose is creating an obstruction on course.  ;<)

>> Cosmo
>> R-100 (all)

> Dunno aobut either of the above.

Seems to me these are much akin to the RX-3.

>> Lancer, Lancer EVO, Charisma EVO {ed. note, non-USA car}

> Idunno.

Midsize sedans with decent motors - basically 4-door Talons. Cool cars, no
more problematic than any other DSM.

>> 405 M116

> Sedan. Rare because Peugeot had trouble giving them away in this
> country, but not a threat to SM.

>> R5 Turbo

> Not US-legal. Since the entire driveline in the Turbo I (or was
> it Turbo II?) was relocated from the original position in the R5,
> this car should definitely be excluded. Otherwise, you can
> update/backdate an R5 into a midengine car.

>> Fuego Turbo

> I can't see a problem w/Fuegos in SM. They're FWD and not light.

>> Saleen (all)

> Agreed.

>> Shelby (all)

> Yep.

> I'd add Deloreans to the excluded list.

Why? They're absolute pigs. Heavy, heavy car.

DG

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>