Hmmm....in that case you should include the RX-7 2+2's......I have an '88 for
instance but it is not extended like the 300. ;^) BTW, I don't intend to run
it
in SM (we only just discussing having such a class up here in Calgary now)....I
have a couple of other cars....it is just my winter beater at this stage.
Reijo
brandon.fetch@ey.com wrote:
> Replying not specifically to Matt, but....
>
> (no dog in this fight either)
>
> People have asked why the Supra and not the 300ZX:
>
> Wasn't there two models of 300ZX? One coupe and the other a 2+2?
> With the class being in it's infancy, might they have not wanted a whole
> bunch of confusion?
>
> Just a suggestion that I haven't seen here yet. The differences betwen the
> two 300's I mean.
>
> Enjoy.
>
> Brandon
>
>
>*******************************************************************************
>
> Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged
> and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible
> for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the
> message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Ernst & Young LLP
>
>*******************************************************************************
|