alpines
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: rpms vs. mph

To: Ian Spencer <ian@sunbeamalpine.org>
Subject: Re: Re: rpms vs. mph
From: jeyerman@ix.netcom.com
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:01:20 -0400
Even a 4.22:1 rear wouldn't give that RPM- the 3500RPM I quoted was with a 
4.55: 1 rear! (with 15 inch rims)

Jan Eyerman

1959 Hillman Minx
1972 1/2 Plymouth Cricket

Ian Spencer <ian@sunbeamalpine.org> wrote:
> Scott,
If your car was factory equipped with an OD it would be stamped into the data 
tag. It is very possible that your have an OD rear end though. There
was a batch of non OD Series V's sent to North America with 4.22:1 rear ends. I 
have been replacing those 4.22's with 3.89's in the Series V's that I
have encountered and it makes a huge difference. It's more than likely that 
your tach is correct and you just need to swap rear ends. The black
Series V we just restored for Brian Shilt had the same problem. His car was 
undrivable on the highway. He is now very pleased with how it runs.

Scott Donnelly wrote:

> 4th gear, no over drive. I suspect tach error which is apparently common and 
>a low geared axle are causing my rpms to be high. Perhaps my car was
> originally equipped with an overdrive?
> Scott Donnelly
> SV
>
> jeyerman@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > Way, way off..... more like 3500RPM for 60MPH.  Are you sure you are in top 
>gear?
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > Scott Donnelly  wrote:
> > > At 50 mph I am turning about 5000 rpm. Does this sound about right or 
>ismy tach off? If these cars were capable of nearly 100mph, alot must
> > happen within the next 1000 or so rpms!
> > Scott Donnelly
> > SV



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>