[TR] TR 3 Rear Engine Seal
Tony Drews
tony at tonydrews.com
Sat Mar 29 11:11:28 MDT 2014
I've heard good things about this option:
http://www.the-vintage-racer.com/index.php/categoryhome/engine-components/product/53-vsk-t34
It's a seal that doesn't require the crank to be ground. It's
probably the same thing that TRF sells, but less expensive.
Tony Drews
At 08:24 AM 3/29/2014, terryrs at comcast.net wrote:
>Hello everyone. I'm in the process of rebuilding a spare engine for
>TS 58667. Am looking at the options for the rear seal.
>
>1) Grind the scroll and install the new aluminum casting modified
>for a rubber oil seal. This would be Moss # 837-006 at $200, plus
>cost of grinding the scroll on the crank. I've run those on the
>past two rebuilds and am satisfied. I still have leaks, but
>probably more from the breather pipe than anything. I do hate the
>thought of grinding another good crankshaft that my machine shop
>just finished going to a mere .10 under with. Seems wrong somehow.
>
>2) Second option is to buy the modified rear seal kit HP599 from TRF
>which also includes a new aluminum casting, rubber seal and
>centering tool at $229, but no cost for grinding the scroll on the crank.
>
>3) The third option is to stay with the original aluminum casting
>rear seal. Past advice on the List here is mixed. Some say reuse
>the old seal, some say you can't judge wear easily so replace
>it. Cost for a new casting is $78 but it does take a centering tool
>I don't have for another $56.
>
>Before I decide, I could really use the advice again of people
>who've driven the stock rear seal. Thoughts?
>
>Terry Smith, '59 TR3A
>New Hampshire
>
>** triumphs at autox.team.net **
>
>Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
>Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
>Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
>Unsubscribe/Manage:
>http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/tony@tonydrews.com
More information about the Triumphs
mailing list