[TR] TR- non tr

[John Macartney]

I guess terminologies vary from country to country? In the UK, we'd call it
New Old Stock if it was an unused part in its original packing - e.g. Stanpart
or that of a proprietary manufacturer like Lucas, Lockheed, Girling. All would
rate as having equal status, originality and 'genuine-ness.' There wouldn't be
as much street-cred for another unused 'as new' part in non-identifiable
packing. I suppose the desireability for such a part would depend entirely on
the part, whether or not its still available and how much someone wants to
have it for their car.

Jonmac




________________________________
From:
"L1J1S at aol.com" <L1J1S at aol.com>
To: triumphs at autox.team.net
Sent: Sun, 14
February, 2010 13:23:30
Subject: [TR] TR- non tr

list, what is the true
definition of NOS?. I purchased a part ten years ago 
from a vender. the part
is still in the original plastic bag, unopened. 
can this  part be put under
the classification of NOS? or is there another 
term that  should be applied
to a ten year old new part? and finally, for a 
original part  from the days
back, what would that be called?  larry  schwartz
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net 
http://www.team.net/donate.html

Suggested annual donation  $11.47


You are
subscribed as macartney.john at yahoo.co.uk

Triumphs at autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs

http://www.team.net/archive